Hallo, linux-btrfs,
First I create an array of 2 disks with
mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdd1
and mount it at /srv/MM.
Then I fill it with about 1,6 TByte.
And then I add /dev/sde1 via
btrfs device add /dev/sde1 /srv/MM
btrfs filesystem balance /srv/MM
(it run about 20
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
I can't switch a running "btrfs filesystem balance ..." via
ctrl z
bg
into the background, with other jobs this way works.
The stopping command "ctrl z" doesn't work.
(may be on other keyboards it's "ctrl y")
What goes wrong?
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To un
This patch fixes memory leaks in btrfs_new_inode().
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sano
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index aa116dc..d8c93c1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -
This patch checks return value of btrfs_alloc_path() and removes BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sano
---
fs/btrfs/dir-item.c|2 ++
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 12
fs/btrfs/file-item.c |6 --
fs/btrfs/file.c|3 ++-
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 34 ++
> > > In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit
> > > 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
> > > (Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space
> > > infos at
> > > the very beginning. The problem is this initialization does not take the
> > > mixed
> > > case into account,
> > When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data & metadata option, it will have
> > no
> > pure data or pure metadata space info.
> >
> > In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
> > (Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space infos
>
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:44:37 +0800
liubo wrote:
>
> When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data & metadata option, it will have no
> pure data or pure metadata space info.
>
> In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
> (Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem afte
Hello,
So I've been trying to track down checksumming errors Eric Paris was
getting while running Windows 7 in qemu. Turns out we had one valid
problem (we don't deal well with reading with an iovec with two
iov_base's that are the same), and we have a problem with the pages
being changed in
Apparently it is ok to submit a read to an IDE device with the same target page
for different offsets. This is what Windows does under qemu. The problem is
under DIO we expect them to be different buffers for checksumming reasons, and
so this sort of thing will result in checksum errors, when in
> a missing check ...
ah, forget it,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:12:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> > index 5fdb2ab..a8fbb07 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> > @@ -2375,6 +2375,38 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioc
On 04/08/2011 01:53 AM, Jeff Wu wrote:
Hi ,
I applied the patch to 2.6.39-rc1,took the following steps to compile
it:make&& make modules_install&& make install&& mkinitramfs
but , it seam that it don't run to "WARN_ON(block_rsv ==
root->orphan_block_rsv);"
i attached the codes and logs at th
Hi,
nope. All patches to the btrfs-progs aren't yet in the git. I think
it's up to chris to push all the patches.
Regards,
Felix
Am 08 Apr 2011 14:00:00 +0200
schrieb "Helmut Hullen" :
> Hallo, linux-btrfs,
>
> when I run "balance" or "delete" and "/dev/btrfs-control" doesn't
> exist or is no
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:37:15PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for separate mail, just noticed a kfree inside a spinlock below
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -2115,10 +2162,20 @@ int bt
Hi, Li,
Thanks for the comments.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:26:17AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> 01:06, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > This patch introduces a basic form of progress monitoring for balance
> > operations, by counting the number of block groups remaining. The
> > information is exposed to
On 04/07/2011 10:26 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Hi Josef, Chris,
On 8 April 2011 00:23, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 04/07/2011 03:21 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
When running a practical stress-test on 2.6.29-rc2 trying to reproduce
an older (extent refcounting) issue, I am consistently able to hit
Hi,
sorry for separate mail, just noticed a kfree inside a spinlock below
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -2115,10 +2162,20 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
>
On 04/08/2011 03:31 AM, liubo wrote:
On 12/10/2010 02:31 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
So alot of crazy people (I'm looking at you Meego) want to use btrfs on phones
and such with small devices. Unfortunately the way we split out metadata/data
chunks it makes space usage inefficient for volumes that a
Hi,
a missing check ...
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> This patch introduces a basic form of progress monitoring for balance
> operations, by counting the number of block groups remaining. The
> information is exposed to userspace by an ioctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hu
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
when I run "balance" or "delete" and "/dev/btrfs-control" doesn't exist
or is nor properly designed (I don't use "udev") then the program shows
an error message and then continiues its work; the result is garbage.
The programs (or program options) which use a wellformed de
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
is the patch mentionend in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/7473
included now?
I still get error messages related to floppy when I run "balance", when
I run "show" then btrfs still tries many non existing devices (I don't
use "udev").
Kerne
When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data & metadata option, it will have no
pure data or pure metadata space info.
In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
(Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space infos at
the very beginning. The
On 12/10/2010 02:31 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> So alot of crazy people (I'm looking at you Meego) want to use btrfs on phones
> and such with small devices. Unfortunately the way we split out metadata/data
> chunks it makes space usage inefficient for volumes that are smaller than
> 1gigabyte. So a
22 matches
Mail list logo
