Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] Add io{read|write}64 to io-64-atomic headers

Logan Gunthorpe writes: > On 4/4/2018 4:38 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: ... >> eg. It looks like I could take the two powerpc patches on their own for >> 4.17, and then the rest could go via other trees? > > Yup! If you can take the powerpc patches I can keep trying to get the

Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] Add io{read|write}64 to io-64-atomic headers

On 4/4/2018 4:38 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: What's the plan for getting it merged? Seems we don't have one? Yeah, so far there is no plan. I'm not really sure who's attention I need to get or how to get it. Given it touches two arches and generic stuff and drivers and crypto, it's a bit

Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] Add io{read|write}64 to io-64-atomic headers

Logan Gunthorpe writes: > This is v14 of my cleanup series to push a number of instances of people > defining their own io{read|write}64 functions into common headers seing > they don't exist in non-64bit systems. This series adds inline functions to > the > io-64-nonatomic

[PATCH v15 0/9] Add io{read|write}64 to io-64-atomic headers

This is v14 of my cleanup series to push a number of instances of people defining their own io{read|write}64 functions into common headers seing they don't exist in non-64bit systems. This series adds inline functions to the io-64-nonatomic headers and then cleans up the drivers that defined their