On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:54:21 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> I guess those three guides complement each other, the first one with a
> comprehensive explanation; the second one with a quick list of
> tasks to submit a patch and the third one with a list of things to
> verify when submitting a
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:04:15 +0100
Andrew Clayton wrote:
> In Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst there were a couple of paragraphs
> that spilled over the 80 character line length. This was likely caused
> when the document was converted to reStructuredText. Re-flow the
> paragraphs and make the
Em Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:33:29 +0300
Jani Nikula escreveu:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Andrew Clayton wrote:
> > In Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst there were a couple of paragraphs
> > that spilled over the 80 character line length. This was likely caused
> > when the document was converted to reSt
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Andrew Clayton wrote:
> In Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst there were a couple of paragraphs
> that spilled over the 80 character line length. This was likely caused
> when the document was converted to reStructuredText. Re-flow the
> paragraphs and make the document refere
In Documentation/process/4.Coding.rst there were a couple of paragraphs
that spilled over the 80 character line length. This was likely caused
when the document was converted to reStructuredText. Re-flow the
paragraphs and make the document references proper reStructuredText
:ref: links.
This also