Hi Bill,
Thanks for still working on this.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:53:49AM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..153d455
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#
> +# PWM infrastru
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:22:27PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Sascha:
>
>
>
> The objective of the sysfs request attribute is to prevent
> simultaneous uses of a channel in both kernel and user spaces. Same
> as with GPIO pins.
The gpio framework does this with 'export', and it does exactly
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:56:57AM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Sascha:
>
>
> Keep the great comments coming! My replies inlined below.
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > The gpio framework does this with 'export', and it does ex
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 09:38:38PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Andrew, Linus:
>
>
> The git repository described in the following pull request implements
> a generic PWM device driver API. This API is intended to eventually
> supercede the existing PWM device drivers, but during a migration
> p
Hi Andrey,
+Cc NeilBrown
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:24:58PM +0300, Andrey Vostrikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an embedded system with microcontroller connected via
> UART/RS232 port. This microcontroller implements several low-level
> functions that need to be exposed as device drivers in other
>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:42:35PM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Robert Schwebel wrote:
>>
>>> The question I've been looking at is: do sub-second boot times make
>>> all this a moot point? After all, if you can bring up your graphics
>>> driver in a fraction of a second and use *it* to display a
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:33:26PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:28:26AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > That's bad :-) So there is no room for improvement any more in our
> > > > ARM b
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:31:42PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:33:26PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Au
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>>
>> Yes, correct. The copying itself is between 'copy' and 'done' so it
>> takes about 0.4s.
>>
>>> What's the size of the uncompressed kernel copied here?
>>
>> The image is about 2.8MB, but I copied the whole partition of 3MB
>> becaus
