On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:39:46 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:53 -0800
>
> > > NETWORKING===
> > >
> >
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:58:24 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:49:16 -0800
>
> > Do you believe that our response to bug reports is adequate?
>
> Do you feel that making
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:32:07 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:12:59 -0800
>
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:58:24 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:32:19 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's another issue I want to raise concerning bugzilla. We have the
> classic case of "not enough people reading bugzilla bugs" - which is one
> of the biggest problems with bugzilla. Virtually no one in the ARM
> co
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:33:58 +0100 Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 November 2007 15:18:07 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> >
> > I just find it weird that something can be known broken for several -rc*
> > kernels before I happen to install it, discover it's broken on my own
> > mach
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:18:01 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:52:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:32:19 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There's another issue I want to rais
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:24:14 +0100 Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 November 2007 13:56:58 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > It's relatively common that a regression in subsystem A will manifest as a
> > failure in subsystem B, and the repor
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:09:37 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:32:01PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:18:01 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:52:2
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:29:54 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:13:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:32:19PM +, Russell King wrote:
> > >...
> > > There's another issue I want to raise concerning bugzilla. We have the
> > > c
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:11:25 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9373
>
>Summary: PDC20267 exception Emask on I/O
>Product: IO/Storage
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.24-rc2
> Platform: All
>
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:11:36 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:52:17 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 11/13/2007 04:12 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > >> Bug fixing is not about finding someone to blame, it's about getting the
> > >> bug
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:55:51 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me just say - I'm astonished at how little spam gets though the vger
lists. Considering how many times those email addresses must have been
added to spam databases.
It must be a
(switched to email - please reply via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface)
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:39:41 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9393
>
>Summary: SError: { DevExch } occuring and causing disruption
>
e has SMART capability.
> SMART support is: Enabled
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> compile recent vanilla kernel from GIT with libata support and install
> following drive to NCQ capable SATA controller.
>
>
Thanks. Could you please send that backlisting patch via email to
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/
>
> Hello,
>
> My system hangs shortly afte
(cc linux-ide)
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:48:21 -0500 (EST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For example, 2.6.23.1:
>
> Linux version 2.6.23.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.2) #1 SMP PREEMPT
> Fri Oct 26 13:09:09 CDT 2007
> kernel: hdd: HP DVD Writer 1040d, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> kernel: hdd: AT
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:55:15 +0100 Jan-Simon M__ller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
You removed from cc the guys who are most likely to fix this. Please always
do reply-to-all.
> Just using kernel 2.6.24-rc2 (325d22df7b19e0116aff3391d3a03f73d0634ded).
>
> When booting the system hangs, using
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:16:13 +0800 Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> these utilities implemented in lib/hexdump.c are more handy, please use this.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c
> @@ -242,16 +242,6 @@ static void idescsi_output_buffers (ide_drive_
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:01:31 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reliably spams dmesg with end_request() horrors. This happens when git
> starts checking out linux tree to fresh ext2 partition. Disk is several
> month old and there were no prolems with, say, 2.6.24-rc3:
>
> [ 225.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:14:21 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:40:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:01:31 +0300
> > Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Reliably sp
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:26:08 -0500 (EST)
Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am putting a new machine together and I have dual raptor raid 1 for the
> root, which works just fine under all stress tests.
>
> Then I have the WD 750 GiB drive (not RE2, desktop ones for ~150-160 on
> sale n
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:38:08 -0500 (EST)
Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:26:08 -0500 (EST)
> > Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am putting a
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 01:33:16 + (UTC)
Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Lanyon gmail.com> writes:
>
> > scsi4: ahci
> > ata5: SATA link up at 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> > ata5.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/66
> > ata5.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xef)
> > ata5.00: failed to set xfermode
(argh, shit, resent. Please don't massage the cc list. Do reply-to-all)
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 01:33:16 + (UTC)
Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Lanyon gmail.com> writes:
>
> > scsi4: ahci
> > ata5: SATA link up at 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> > ata5.00: ATAPI, max UD
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:12:57 +0100 Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:36:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Subject : PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
> > > beyond end of object
> &
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:40:49 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline that I know of. If any of them have been fixe
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
> > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [cut]
> > > > > Now with MM ker
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:09:43 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:24 +
> > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > While I'm reporting pr
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:02:54 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 02:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:01:33 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either ATA or ACPI.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:52:43 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
>
> Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either AT
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:55:06 + Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rework the pata_legacy driver to have an internal way to plug multiple legacy
> interface types
> and designs into the driver.
>
> This driver supports
> - Generic legacy ISA on primary/secondary and tertiary ports
>
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:09:59 +0100
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, it's a vm issue,
cc linux-mm and probable culprit.
> I have tens of thousand "backward" pages after a
> boot - IOW, bvec->bv_page is the page before bvprv->bv_page, not
> reverse. So it looks like that bug got rein
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:15:06 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:09:59 +0100
> > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:30:00 -0500
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the commit that causes the regression:
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -760,7 +760,8 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int
> order,
> struct page *pa
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:40:09 -0500
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And here is a patch that seems to fix it for me here:
>
> * * * *
>
> Fix page allocator to give better change of larger contiguous segments
> (again).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
>
>
> --- ol
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:57:29 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:46 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> > "Improved version", more similar to the 2.6.23 code:
> >
> > Fix page allocator to give better chance of larger contiguous segments
> > (again).
> >
> > Sig
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:09:43 -0500 trash can <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have tolerated this problem for a year and do not post to this list in
> haste. I have posted on forums and searched the community over the past
> year.
Your report is
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:10:47 +0100 Zsolt Barat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zsolt Barat schrieb:
> > hi list,
Let's cc the IDE development list.
> > i just bought a "MyBook" called external HD with a fixed enclosure, from
> > WD. Connected to the SATA port i constantly get "ATA bus error" messag
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:59:03 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (added linux-ide)
(Ths time for real)
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:36:04 +0200 (EET) Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I just noticed that all my recent test kernels on
int.
> >
> > While at it, rename @adev of ata_pci_default_filter() to @dev for
> > consistency.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fix types]
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:48:49 +0100 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch series is a major rework of the ide-cd driver.
woo-hoo.
> PS ide-cd Maintainer position is still open...
boo-hoo.
I wish someone would fix that "The drive appears confused (ireason =
0x%02x)"
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:19:20 +0200 Georgi Chulkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> During heavy disk load on my laptop, sometimes the IDE disk will pause for a
> second and then continue. I get this in my kernel log:
>
> [ 9031.028000] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 actio
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:46:29 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9837
>
>Summary: I can't boot with a PLEXTOR PX-740A
>Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.24-4.7
> P
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:56:37 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9845
>
>Summary: libata still broken for Pegasos on 2.6.24
>Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.24
>
(added linux-ide)
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:30:04 -0600
Mike Hokenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently put together a new system with a MSI P35 PLATINUM and although
> reading from data CDs, DVDs, and watching DVD movies is working fine, DVD
> burning isn't. MSI's manual says "1 IDE port by M
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:16:51 -0600
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:40:56 -0600
> Subject: [SCSI] enclosure: add support for enclosure services
>
> The enclosure misc device is really just a library providing sysf
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:09:36 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9898
>
>Summary: libata fails for ALi Corporation M5229 IDE
>Product: IO/Storage
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.24
> Platform: All
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:40:15 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9901
>
>Summary: kernel panic in stex modules (?)
>Product: IO/Storage
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.24
> Platform: All
>
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:30:42 -0500
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ..
>
> Yup, obvious bug fixes, thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Typically we'll use Acked-by: here. Because Signed-off-by: implies that
you were in t
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:52:27 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ATAPI devices transfer fixed number of bytes for CDBs (12 or 16).
> Some ATAPI devices choke when shorter CDB is used and the left bytes
> contain garbage. Block SG_IO cleared left bytes but SCSI SG_IO
> didn't. This patch
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:52:28 +
"Andrew Lyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comparing the first 32k of the 4 disks under 2.6.18.2 and 2.6.19-rc5
> there is no difference, so I decided to compare the bootup dmesg, the
> following text is not output with 2.6.19-rc5:
>
> md: md driver 0.90.3 MA
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:43:34 +
Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:20:12 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't know if they're still concerns, nor if they're fatal concerns
> > > either. But I've been sitting on that patch for nearly five months.
>
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:34:52 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:43:34 +
> > Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:20:12 -0500
> >> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL P
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:20:19 -0600
Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> static irqreturn_t nv_adma_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
> {
> struct ata_host *host = dev_instance;
> int i, handled = 0;
> + u32 notifier_clears[2];
>
> spin_lock(&host->lock);
>
>
oops, we went backwards.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:33:38 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7589] New: libata: does not work anymore on VIA
VT8251 AHCI/SATA 4-Port Controller
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7589
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:49:31 +
Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add a driver for the IT8213 which is a single channel ICH-ish PATA
> controller. As it is very different to the IT8211/2 it gets its own
> driver. There is a legacy drivers/ide driver also available and I'll post
> that once I get
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:56:42 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes.patch
> > via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes-fix.patch
>
> Tejun's 3d3cca37559e3ab2b574eda11ed5207ccdb8980a has been ack'd by the
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 03:19:40 +0800
Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:56:42 -0500
> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew Morton wrote:
&g
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:16:40 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Gaston wrote:
> > This updated patch adds the Intel ICH9 IDE mode SATA controller DID's.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ACK but your mailer is still chomping things.
>
> Andrew, do yo
[ 231.948000] SCSI device sda: 195371568 512-byte hdwr sectors (100030 MB)
[ 232.232000] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
[ 232.404000] WARNING (1) at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:47 kmap_atomic()
[ 232.404000] [] kmap_atomic+0xa9/0x1ab
[ 232.404000] [] ata_scsi_rbuf_get+0x1c/0x30
[ 232.404000] [
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:07:06 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > [ 231.948000] SCSI device sda: 195371568 512-byte hdwr sectors (100030 MB)
> > [ 232.232000] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
> > [ 232.404000] WARNING (1) a
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:45:55 +0059
Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/
> >
> > Will appear later at
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kerne
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:40:29 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:07:06 -0500
> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> [ 231.948000] SCSI device
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:20:37 +0100
"Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 1.In Kernels 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc3 a CD- and DVD-burning application
> called nerolinux is doing nasty things:
> After a cold start you start the application, then chose the burning device,
> then close the app
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A previous patch to atiixp.c was removed but some code has not been
cleaned. Now we remove these code sine they are no use any longer.
Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL P
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:33:44 +0100
"Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subject: problems with CD burning
> > References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg06545.html
> > Submitter : Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Status : unknown
> >
> >
>
> ...
>
> Hi everybody,
> t
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:26:03 +0100
Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I just tried it with 2.6.20-rc6, and can confirm. Once nero is
> run, the kernel never gives up retrying whatever command failed, so I
> get...
>
> [ 4362.972995] hdd: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady Seek
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:50:58 -0600
Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the attached patch, nero finds the cd drives and I can burn disks.
> There is no errors from the ide layer like before.
>
>
> [use-old-timeout-calc.patch text/x-patch (399B)]
> diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/b
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:18:38 -0500
Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. here is a fix with the overflow check sg.c has. Patch
> was made against Linus's tree and tested with nero.
>
> Userspace does not send us jiffies. Use msecs_to_jiffies
> and check for overflow like sg.c
>
> Signed
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:47:27 -0600
Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch for sd.c I've cooked up which issues a START STOP UNIT
> command to stop the drive when the SCSI disk is removed or the machine
> is powered down. The rationale behind this is that apparently on many
> dr
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:13:56 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > pata_atiixp: propogate cable detection hack from drivers/ide to the
> > new driver
>
> It's prop*a*gate.
>
> Damn.
>
> Linus "some spel
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:15:15 +
Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the first preparation to doing the !IORDY cases properly. Further
> diffs will then add the needed logic to do it right.
>
>...
>
> static int pio_mask = 0x1F; /* PIO range for autospeed devices */
> ++static in
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:28:30 +
Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we are doing a PIO setup for a CFA card and it blows up with a device
> error then assume it is an older CFA card which doesn't support this
> rather than failing the device out of existance.
>
> Stands seperate to the quietin
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:11:52 +
Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > libata-fix-hopefully-all-the-remaining-problems-with.patch. Should I drop
> >
>
> The hopefully fix all the remaining problems patch did say not to merge
> it I thought. Please don't merge it yet - Jeff has asked for some
> i
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:22:06 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andrew,
> This bug seem to be duplicate of 7907, which in turn seem to be caused
> by latest libata patches.
Oh. Surprised. Let's tell Jeff about it.
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:42:04 +
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:40:22PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > If an ATA drive uses legacy mode, ata driver will choose 14 and 15 as the
> > fixed irq number. On ia64 platform, such numbers are GSI and should be
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:34:53 +
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:25:39PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:42:04 +
> > Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 0
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 February 2007 06:51, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm2/
> >
> > Will appear
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:25:48 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > netconsole is good.
>
> I know. :-)
>
> In the meantime, I've got something worse on another x86_64 box:
>
> Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30
> L5D model detected, supported
> audit(1171831698.918:2): a
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:20:21 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 February 2007 20:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:44:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> &g
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:08:10 -0700
Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ===
> --- 2.6-git.orig/include/linux/libata.h
> +++ 2.6-git/include/linux/libata.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ enum {
> ATA_DFLAG_FLUSH_EXT = (
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 01:39:12 +0200
Chr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7. August 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > From: Christian Lamparter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This is commit c1e6f28cc5de37dcd113b9668a185c0b9334ba8a which is
> > merged during 23-rc1 window. Considering the popularit
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:24:39 +0200
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc3/2.6.23-rc3-mm1/
> [snip]
> > -ata-add-the-s
those readable from PCI config space aren't consistent anymore.
Therefore, this patch arranges for the respective BARs to also get updated if
possible.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just remove that chunk]
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Kristofer T. Karas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:14:49 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8936
>
>Summary: sata_promise 2.09 fails to identify ST3400832AS
>Product: IO/Storage
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.23-rc1
> Platf
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:12:31 +0200 (MEST)
Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:21:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:14:49 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > http://bugzilla.k
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 18:07:48 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/1/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc4/2.6.23-rc4-mm1/
>
> The good:
>
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 13:40:10 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8976
This one is apparantly a post-2.6.22 regression.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordo
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:06:41 +0200 "Maarten Maathuis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> I have not had any issues, i swapped the cable because a while ago i
> had to check the connection of the drive after the bios failed to
> detect the drive. That is why i considered that a posibility. Kernel
> 2
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:53:00 +0900 Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [Adding linux-ide to CC]
> >
> > On 25/08/07, Bryan Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi KML
> >>
> >> I am installing gentoo 2007.0 (kernel 2.6.19) on a dual AMD Opteron serve
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:23:35 -0400 Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> please try 2.6.22.5. Even if it doesn't fix the problem, it would
> >> report error conditions better.
> >
> > Presumably in the week and
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:24:18 + Nigel Kukard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrmmm,
>
> >> >
> >> > > > Jun 14 07:55:52 nigel-m2v kernel: ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port
> >> > > > 0x0001c807
> >> > > > Jun 14 07:55:52 nigel-m2v kernel: ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port
> >> > > > 0x0
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:59:49 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:49:26 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a couple
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:35:26 +0200
Patrizio Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrizio Bassi ha scritto:
> > Jan Engelhardt ha scritto:
> >> On Sep 8 2007 11:38, Patrizio Bassi wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >>>
> I shall give this a spin too, since I happen to have sis5513.
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:01:03 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:31:12AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > [...]
> > >
> > > Even if we revert the qla1280 patch, scsi-ml still sends chaining sg
> >
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:47:05 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > Purely a stylistic issue currently but best done while I notice it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > diff -u --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude --new-file --recursive
> > linu
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:28:01 +0800 "Peer Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the description of section 5.2.2.1 and 10.1.2 of AHCI
> specification rev1_1/rev1_2, GHC.HR shall only be set to __1__
> by software when GHC.AE is set to __1__.
This text contained non-ascii garbage which c
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:48:28 -0700 Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
> > Drain up to 512 words from host/bridge FIFO on stuck DRQ HSM violation,
> > rather than just getting stuck there forever.
> >
> > Signed-Off-By: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:29:44 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (my last response only addressed -mm)
>
> Mark Lord wrote:
> > I believe the point was that getting things into libata is glacial
>
> IMHO would say that there are two causes of that:
> 1) I am sometimes slow in merging,
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
