On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:54:12AM +, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
> > > I did not use devm_gpiod_get_optional() in order to ignore more errors
> > > than -ENOENT. This is needed because the ACPI gpio core will fall back
> > > to indexed gpios if named gpios are not found. In the common case of
> > > h
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:23:03PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I understand why one might use acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() to augment
> data in ACPI, however here we have completely different issue: driver
> that expects named gpios gets returned gpio that has nothing to do with
> what it reques
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 02:18:20PM +0300, mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:23:03PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > I understand why one might use acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() to augment
> > data in ACPI, however here we have completely differen
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:32:24PM +, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: linux-input-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-input-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
> > mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
> > Sent: 14 October
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:33:28AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> cpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() does not really help with generic drivers
> (unless we keep adding more and more board specific data to them). How
> about we keep track of names used and only allow conversion for the
> first name used, l
