On 01/24/2018 08:48 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
> If we then OR this with 0x40, then the value of 6th bit (0th is first bit)
> become known, so the right mask is 0xbf instead of 0xcf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing
Applied to bpf-next, thanks Wang!
On 24/01/18 07:48, Wang YanQing wrote:
> If we then OR this with 0x40, then the value of 6th bit (0th is first bit)
> become known, so the right mask is 0xbf instead of 0xcf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing
> ---
> Documentation/networking/filter.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 de
If we then OR this with 0x40, then the value of 6th bit (0th is first bit)
become known, so the right mask is 0xbf instead of 0xcf.
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing
---
Documentation/networking/filter.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/fil
3 matches
Mail list logo