Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 06:35, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Peter,
Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right,
Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 06:35, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Peter,
Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one!
On 2017-07-07 06:35, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Quoting Peter Rosin :
>
>> On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
>>> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
>>
>> Right, thanks for finding that
On 2017-07-07 06:35, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Quoting Peter Rosin :
>
>> On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
>>> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
>>
>> Right, thanks for finding that one! There's
Hi Peter,
Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one! There's another one inside the
for loop that is just starting
Hi Peter,
Quoting Peter Rosin :
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one! There's another one inside the
for loop that is just starting in the context of
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one! There's another one inside the
for loop that is just starting in the context of this patch. Care
to fix checking
On 2017-07-07 00:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
> in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
Right, thanks for finding that one! There's another one inside the
for loop that is just starting in the context of this patch. Care
to fix checking
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
This issue was detected using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression x;
identifier fld;
@@
* x = devm_kzalloc(...);
... when != x == NULL
x->fld
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R.
Check return value from call to devm_kzalloc()
in order to prevent a NULL pointer dereference.
This issue was detected using Coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression x;
identifier fld;
@@
* x = devm_kzalloc(...);
... when != x == NULL
x->fld
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R.
10 matches
Mail list logo