On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Philipp Hachtmann wrote:
> > Not sure why you don't just do a one line patch:
> >
> > - phys_addr_t size;
> > + phys_addr_t size __maybe_unused;
> > to fix it.
>
> Just because I did not know that __maybe_unused thing.
>
- phys_addr_t size;
+ phys_addr_t si
Am Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:16:33 -0800 (PST)
schrieb David Rientjes :
> Not sure why you don't just do a one line patch:
>
> - phys_addr_t size;
> + phys_addr_t size __maybe_unused;
> to fix it.
Just because I did not know that __maybe_unused thing.
Discussion of this fix seems to be obso
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Philipp Hachtmann wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
> index e2906a5..0215c77 100644
> --- a/mm/nobootmem.c
> +++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
> @@ -116,23 +116,29 @@ static unsigned long __init
> __free_memory_core(phys_addr_t start,
> static unsigned long __init fre
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Philipp Hachtmann
wrote:
> This fixes an unused variable warning in nobootmem.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Hachtmann
> ---
> mm/nobootmem.c | 28 +---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm
This fixes an unused variable warning in nobootmem.c
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hachtmann
---
mm/nobootmem.c | 28 +---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
index e2906a5..0215c77 100644
--- a/mm/nobootmem.c
+++ b/mm/
5 matches
Mail list logo