On 10/2/20 4:25 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 30-09-20 15:03:11, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 9/30/20 1:47 PM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
>>> On 9/30/2020 11:20 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 9/29/20 9:49 AM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
Sorry for jumping in so late. Should we use this as an
On Wed 30-09-20 15:03:11, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 9/30/20 1:47 PM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
> > On 9/30/2020 11:20 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >> On 9/29/20 9:49 AM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry for jumping in so late. Should we use this as an opportunity to
> >> also fix up the message
On 9/30/20 1:47 PM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
> On 9/30/2020 11:20 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 9/29/20 9:49 AM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for jumping in so late. Should we use this as an opportunity to
>> also fix up the messages logged when (re)calculating mfk? They are wrong
>> and
On 9/30/2020 11:20 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 9/29/20 9:49 AM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
When memory is hotplug added or removed the min_free_kbytes should be
recalculated based on what is expected by khugepaged. Currently
after hotplug, min_free_kbytes will be set to a lower default and high
On 9/29/20 9:49 AM, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
> When memory is hotplug added or removed the min_free_kbytes should be
> recalculated based on what is expected by khugepaged. Currently
> after hotplug, min_free_kbytes will be set to a lower default and higher
> default set when THP enabled is lost.
When memory is hotplug added or removed the min_free_kbytes should be
recalculated based on what is expected by khugepaged. Currently
after hotplug, min_free_kbytes will be set to a lower default and higher
default set when THP enabled is lost. This change restores min_free_kbytes
as expected for
6 matches
Mail list logo