On 04/12/2018 09:02 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 06-04-18, 16:36, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
is factored out into a separate function.
Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
out if a cpu or a
On 04/12/2018 09:02 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 06-04-18, 16:36, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
is factored out into a separate function.
Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
out if a cpu or a
On 06-04-18, 16:36, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
> is factored out into a separate function.
>
> Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
> out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized.
>
> Cc:
On 06-04-18, 16:36, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
> is factored out into a separate function.
>
> Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
> out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized.
>
> Cc:
The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
is factored out into a separate function.
Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized.
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
is factored out into a separate function.
Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized.
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Dietmar
6 matches
Mail list logo