Hi,
* John Stultz [181025 17:15]:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:04 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> > Should we check wakeirq before we set the second elements of res[]?
>
> Here's my first swing at doing the above. It seems to work ok. Let me
> know if it looks reasonable and I'll submit it as a
Hi,
* John Stultz [181025 17:15]:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:04 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> > Should we check wakeirq before we set the second elements of res[]?
>
> Here's my first swing at doing the above. It seems to work ok. Let me
> know if it looks reasonable and I'll submit it as a
* John Stultz [181025 17:04]:
> Hey Tony,
> In testing linus/master on my hikey board, I'm hitting the following
> OOPS on bootup:
>
> [1.870279] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at
...
> [1.870485] wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350
> [1.870491]
* John Stultz [181025 17:04]:
> Hey Tony,
> In testing linus/master on my hikey board, I'm hitting the following
> OOPS on bootup:
>
> [1.870279] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at
...
> [1.870485] wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350
> [1.870491]
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:04 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> Hey Tony,
> In testing linus/master on my hikey board, I'm hitting the following
> OOPS on bootup:
>
> [1.870279] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at
> virtual address 0010
> [1.870283] Mem abort info:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:04 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> Hey Tony,
> In testing linus/master on my hikey board, I'm hitting the following
> OOPS on bootup:
>
> [1.870279] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at
> virtual address 0010
> [1.870283] Mem abort info:
6 matches
Mail list logo