On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 01:12:08PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I might just be looking at the wrong place and if so I'm sorry, but I
> don't see any (additional) fixes related to this here:
Seems to have got stuck somewhere, sorry - pushed now.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 01:12:08PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I might just be looking at the wrong place and if so I'm sorry, but I
> don't see any (additional) fixes related to this here:
Seems to have got stuck somewhere, sorry - pushed now.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 20-02-18 12:47, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:59:13PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 19-02-18 12:34, Mark Brown wrote:
There are multiple callers of regulator_get_suspend_state() in
drivers/regulator/core.c, I assume you refer to this commit:
Hi,
On 20-02-18 12:47, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:59:13PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 19-02-18 12:34, Mark Brown wrote:
There are multiple callers of regulator_get_suspend_state() in
drivers/regulator/core.c, I assume you refer to this commit:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:59:13PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 19-02-18 12:34, Mark Brown wrote:
> There are multiple callers of regulator_get_suspend_state() in
> drivers/regulator/core.c, I assume you refer to this commit:
>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:59:13PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 19-02-18 12:34, Mark Brown wrote:
> There are multiple callers of regulator_get_suspend_state() in
> drivers/regulator/core.c, I assume you refer to this commit:
>
Hi,
On 19-02-18 12:34, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:04:24PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
The regulator framework is used on x86 in some cases now and x86 has
a PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE suspend_state_t, treat this as PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY,
this fixes these errors on resume:
This was
Hi,
On 19-02-18 12:34, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:04:24PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
The regulator framework is used on x86 in some cases now and x86 has
a PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE suspend_state_t, treat this as PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY,
this fixes these errors on resume:
This was
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:04:24PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The regulator framework is used on x86 in some cases now and x86 has
> a PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE suspend_state_t, treat this as PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY,
> this fixes these errors on resume:
This was already fixed by Geert.
signature.asc
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:04:24PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The regulator framework is used on x86 in some cases now and x86 has
> a PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE suspend_state_t, treat this as PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY,
> this fixes these errors on resume:
This was already fixed by Geert.
signature.asc
10 matches
Mail list logo