On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 17:49 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding
> > everything and
> > in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier.
> >
>
> It's already one
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 17:49 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding
> > everything and
> > in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier.
> >
>
> It's already one
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding
> everything and
> in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier.
>
It's already one release cycle passed. What is the destiny of this
change?
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding
> everything and
> in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier.
>
It's already one release cycle passed. What is the destiny of this
change?
> Signed-off-by:
4 matches
Mail list logo