Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mei: me: use managed functions pcim_* and devm_*

2016-10-14 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 17:49 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding > > everything and > > in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier. > > > > It's already one

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mei: me: use managed functions pcim_* and devm_*

2016-10-14 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 17:49 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding > > everything and > > in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier. > > > > It's already one

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mei: me: use managed functions pcim_* and devm_*

2016-06-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding > everything and > in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier. > It's already one release cycle passed. What is the destiny of this change? > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mei: me: use managed functions pcim_* and devm_*

2016-06-05 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 16:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > This makes the error handling much more simpler than open-coding > everything and > in addition makes the probe function smaller an tidier. > It's already one release cycle passed. What is the destiny of this change? > Signed-off-by: