From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:54:18 +
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:47:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > There was a patch floating around to "fix" it but it's not on-disk
> > compatible w/ x86 & friends, it just makes things consistent for arm. I
> >
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:47:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> There was a patch floating around to "fix" it but it's not on-disk
>> compatible w/ x86 & friends, it just makes things consistent for arm. I
>> think packing some of these structures would take care of
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:47:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> There was a patch floating around to "fix" it but it's not on-disk
> compatible w/ x86 & friends, it just makes things consistent for arm. I
> think packing some of these structures would take care of it, but this
> problem could use
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:47:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
There was a patch floating around to fix it but it's not on-disk
compatible w/ x86 friends, it just makes things consistent for arm. I
think packing some of these structures would take care of it, but this
problem could use some
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:47:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
There was a patch floating around to fix it but it's not on-disk
compatible w/ x86 friends, it just makes things consistent for arm. I
think packing some of these structures would take care of it, but this
From: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:54:18 +
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:47:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
There was a patch floating around to fix it but it's not on-disk
compatible w/ x86 friends, it just makes things consistent for arm. I
think
Andi Kleen wrote:
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> From: Byron Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
>>
>>> Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
>> I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but one thing that some
>> ARM chips have is
Andi Kleen wrote:
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Byron Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but one thing that some
ARM chips have is D-cache aliasing
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:40:48AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:14, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > From: Byron Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
> > > > Anybody got any ideas of how we
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:40:48AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:14, Andi Kleen wrote:
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Byron Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
I
On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:14, Andi Kleen wrote:
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From: Byron Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
> >
> > > Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
> >
> > I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but
On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:14, Andi Kleen wrote:
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Byron Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but one thing that
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Byron Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
>
> > Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
>
> I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but one thing that some
> ARM chips have is D-cache aliasing
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Byron Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but one thing that some
ARM chips have is D-cache aliasing problems and one
From: Byron Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
> Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but one thing that some
ARM chips have is D-cache aliasing problems and one thing XFS uses a
lot is virtual remapping of
[to: linux-xfs]
[cc: lkml]
Hello,
I am one of the developers at http://linkstationwiki.net , we are trying to
port linux (2.6.22) to the LinkStation Pro. This has an ARM926EJ chip and
we are having problems with XFS (the default filesystem for these devices).
While we only have a few users who
[to: linux-xfs]
[cc: lkml]
Hello,
I am one of the developers at http://linkstationwiki.net , we are trying to
port linux (2.6.22) to the LinkStation Pro. This has an ARM926EJ chip and
we are having problems with XFS (the default filesystem for these devices).
While we only have a few users who
From: Byron Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:12:46 + (UTC)
Anybody got any ideas of how we fix this?
I don't know how much testing XFS gets on ARM, but one thing that some
ARM chips have is D-cache aliasing problems and one thing XFS uses a
lot is virtual remapping of
18 matches
Mail list logo
