On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > Alan, Linus, what correction to the which the above thread discusses has
> > been deployed?
>
> This is the hacky "hide the problem" patch that is in my current tree (and
> was discussed
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Alan, Linus, what correction to the which the above thread discusses has
been deployed?
This is the hacky hide the problem patch that is in my current tree (and
was discussed in the original
I couldnt duplicate the performance hit so I believe the proper fix not
the hack is the right one
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
I couldnt duplicate the performance hit so I believe the proper fix not
the hack is the right one
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Alan, Linus, what correction to the which the above thread discusses has
> been deployed?
This is the hacky "hide the problem" patch that is in my current tree (and
was discussed in the original thread some time ago).
It's in no way
Dear, nuclearcat.
You wrote Sunday, February 27, 2005, 4:52:54 PM:
P.S. new kernel - 2.4.29 vanilla
> Dear, Marcelo.
> You wrote Saturday, February 26, 2005, 1:04:32 AM:
> Sorry about delay, i had switched kernel to non-SMP mode.
> I cannot debug on kernel (it is loaded VPN server, and there
Dear, Marcelo.
You wrote Saturday, February 26, 2005, 1:04:32 AM:
Sorry about delay, i had switched kernel to non-SMP mode.
I cannot debug on kernel (it is loaded VPN server, and there is no
redundancy for now).
I have only few old oopses, saved before (it is on old redhat kernel)
Feb 16
(resending since first message didnt seem to go through)
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:56:53AM +0200, nuclearcat wrote:
> Is discussed at
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/12508/thread
> bug fixed in 2.4.x tree? Cause seems i have downloaded 2.4.29, and it
> is not fixed
(resending since first message didnt seem to go through)
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:56:53AM +0200, nuclearcat wrote:
Is discussed at
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/12508/thread
bug fixed in 2.4.x tree? Cause seems i have downloaded 2.4.29, and it
is not fixed (still my
Dear, Marcelo.
You wrote Saturday, February 26, 2005, 1:04:32 AM:
Sorry about delay, i had switched kernel to non-SMP mode.
I cannot debug on kernel (it is loaded VPN server, and there is no
redundancy for now).
I have only few old oopses, saved before (it is on old redhat kernel)
Feb 16
Dear, nuclearcat.
You wrote Sunday, February 27, 2005, 4:52:54 PM:
P.S. new kernel - 2.4.29 vanilla
Dear, Marcelo.
You wrote Saturday, February 26, 2005, 1:04:32 AM:
Sorry about delay, i had switched kernel to non-SMP mode.
I cannot debug on kernel (it is loaded VPN server, and there is
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Alan, Linus, what correction to the which the above thread discusses has
been deployed?
This is the hacky hide the problem patch that is in my current tree (and
was discussed in the original thread some time ago).
It's in no way correct, in
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> BTW, I fail to see any drivers/char/pty.c change related to the race which
> triggers
> the pty_chars_in_buffer->0 oops.
Indeed, I don't think 2.6.x got that merged, because it was never really
clear _which_ fix was the right one (the extra
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:56:53AM +0200, nuclearcat wrote:
> Is discussed at
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/12508/thread
> bug fixed in 2.4.x tree? Cause seems i have downloaded 2.4.29, and it
> is not fixed (still my kernel on vpn server crashing almost at start),
> i
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:56:53AM +0200, nuclearcat wrote:
Is discussed at
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/12508/thread
bug fixed in 2.4.x tree? Cause seems i have downloaded 2.4.29, and it
is not fixed (still my kernel on vpn server crashing almost at start),
i have
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
BTW, I fail to see any drivers/char/pty.c change related to the race which
triggers
the pty_chars_in_buffer-0 oops.
Indeed, I don't think 2.6.x got that merged, because it was never really
clear _which_ fix was the right one (the extra locking
Dear, linux-kernel.
Is discussed at
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/12508/thread
bug fixed in 2.4.x tree? Cause seems i have downloaded 2.4.29, and it
is not fixed (still my kernel on vpn server crashing almost at start),
i have grepped fast pre and bk patches, but didnt found any
Dear, linux-kernel.
Is discussed at
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/12508/thread
bug fixed in 2.4.x tree? Cause seems i have downloaded 2.4.29, and it
is not fixed (still my kernel on vpn server crashing almost at start),
i have grepped fast pre and bk patches, but didnt found any
18 matches
Mail list logo
