On Thursday, August 19, 2010 08:09:27 pm Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Thursday 19 August 2010 14:16:21 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> > On Thursday, August 19, 2010 02:39:47 pm Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > >
> > > No, I don't think you should go to the next power of 2 - that's too
> > > crude. Try ro
Thursday 19 August 2010 14:16:21 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> On Thursday, August 19, 2010 02:39:47 pm Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > No, I don't think you should go to the next power of 2 - that's too
> > crude. Try rounding your buffer size to the page size, that should
> > suffice.
Guennadi,
On Thursday, August 19, 2010 02:39:47 pm Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>
> > Hi Marin,
> > Since I've finaly managed to make use of your method without any previously
> > observerd limitations (see below), I'm interested in it being implemented
> >
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Hi Marin,
> Since I've finaly managed to make use of your method without any previously
> observerd limitations (see below), I'm interested in it being implemented
> system-wide. Are you going to submit a patch?
I'm about to submit a patch, which
Monday 16 August 2010 12:17:36 Marin Mitov wrote:
> On Saturday, August 14, 2010 08:33:09 pm Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > Friday 13 August 2010 11:11:52 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> > > > On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovet
On Saturday, August 14, 2010 08:33:09 pm Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>
> > Friday 13 August 2010 11:11:52 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> > > On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzyszto
Saturday 14 August 2010 19:33:09 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Friday 13 August 2010 11:11:52 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> > > On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wr
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Friday 13 August 2010 11:11:52 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> > On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > > Thursday 12 August 2010 23:38:17 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisa
Saturday 14 August 2010 06:47:56 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> On Friday, August 13, 2010 10:13:08 pm Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Friday 13 August 2010 11:11:52 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> > > On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysz
On Friday, August 13, 2010 10:13:08 pm Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Friday 13 August 2010 11:11:52 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> > On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > > Thursday 12 August 2010 23:38:17 Guennadi Li
Friday 13 August 2010 11:11:52 Marin Mitov napisał(a):
> On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > Thursday 12 August 2010 23:38:17 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> > > > 1. We've discussed this dynamic switching
On Friday, August 13, 2010 11:52:41 am Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>
> > Thursday 12 August 2010 23:38:17 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> > > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > > Friday 30 July 2010 20:49:05 Janusz Krzysztofik
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Thursday 12 August 2010 23:38:17 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > Friday 30 July 2010 20:49:05 Janusz Krzysztofik napisaÅ(a):
> > >
> > > I think the right way would be if implemented at the
Thursday 12 August 2010 23:38:17 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Friday 30 July 2010 20:49:05 Janusz Krzysztofik napisaÅ(a):
> >
> > I think the right way would be if implemented at the videobuf-core level.
> > Then, drivers should be able to i
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Friday 30 July 2010 20:49:05 Janusz Krzysztofik napisaÅ(a):
> > Friday 30 July 2010 13:07:42 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisaÅ(a):
> > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > > This is a V4L2 driver for TI OMAP1 SoC camera interface.
> >
Friday 30 July 2010 20:49:05 Janusz Krzysztofik napisał(a):
> Friday 30 July 2010 13:07:42 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > This is a V4L2 driver for TI OMAP1 SoC camera interface.
> > >
> > > Two versions of the driver are provided, using e
Friday 30 July 2010 13:07:42 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> Hi Janusz
>
> Thanks once more for the patches, from your patches it is obvious, that
> you've spent quite a bit of time on them and you have not just copy-pasted
> various bits and pieces from other drivers, just filling your hardwar
Hi Janusz
Thanks once more for the patches, from your patches it is obvious, that
you've spent quite a bit of time on them and you have not just copy-pasted
various bits and pieces from other drivers, just filling your hardware
details, but you also actually understand a lot of what is actually
This is a V4L2 driver for TI OMAP1 SoC camera interface.
Two versions of the driver are provided, using either videobuf-dma-contig or
videobuf-dma-sg. The former uses less processing power, but often fails to
allocate contignuous buffer memory. The latter is free of this problem, but
generates
19 matches
Mail list logo