Alan,
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > #2 is a tad harder, as it requires to fix the trusted apps not to fire
> >timers when there is nothing to do.
>
> No; all you have to do is handle the trusted apps as though they were
> untrusted --
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Alan,
Thomas:
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Remember that suspend takes place in several phases, the first of which
> > is to freeze tasks. The phases can be controlled individually by the
> > process carrying out a suspend, and ther
Alan,
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > The difference between idle-based suspend and opportunistic suspend is
> > that the former will continue to wake up for timers and will never be
> > entered if something is using CPU, whereas the lat
