Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-13 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:48:16 +0200 > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: > >>> If you want to merge the direct networking parts of this series into >>> another tree, I'm fine with that: >>> >>> Acked-by: David S. Miller >> >> David >> >> Can you the belo

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: >> If you want to merge the direct networking parts of this series into >> another tree, I'm fine with that: >> >> Acked-by: David S. Miller > > David > > Can you the below patch series as i have adopted pinctrl PM api in another > series, > t

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-07 Thread Mugunthan V N
On 6/7/2013 1:12 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:31:58 +0200 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:29:39AM +0530, Mugunthan V N wrote: On 6/6/2013 12:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: Linus Walleij posted some patches whic

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-07 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:31:58 +0200 > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:29:39AM +0530, Mugunthan V N wrote: >>> On 6/6/2013 12:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >> >>> >Linus Walleij posted some patches which factor the state setting cod

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-07 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:29:39AM +0530, Mugunthan V N wrote: >> On 6/6/2013 12:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >> >Linus Walleij posted some patches which factor the state setting code >> >out into generic functions earlier on today - it probably m

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:29:39AM +0530, Mugunthan V N wrote: > On 6/6/2013 12:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >Linus Walleij posted some patches which factor the state setting code > >out into generic functions earlier on today - it probably makes sense to > >pick those up rather than open coding >

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-05 Thread Mugunthan V N
On 6/6/2013 12:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:38:15PM +0530, Mugunthan V N wrote: From: Hebbar Gururaja Amend cpsw controller to optionally take a pin control handle and set the state of the pins to: - "default" on boot, resume - "sleep" on suspend() Linus Walleij posted

Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:38:15PM +0530, Mugunthan V N wrote: > From: Hebbar Gururaja > > Amend cpsw controller to optionally take a pin control handle and set > the state of the pins to: > > - "default" on boot, resume > - "sleep" on suspend() Linus Walleij posted some patches which factor th

[net-next PATCH v4 1/5] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support

2013-06-05 Thread Mugunthan V N
From: Hebbar Gururaja Amend cpsw controller to optionally take a pin control handle and set the state of the pins to: - "default" on boot, resume - "sleep" on suspend() This should make it possible to optimize energy usage for the pins for the suspend/resume cycle. If any of the above pin stat