On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Janek Kozicki wrote:
Justin Piszcz said: (by the date of Sat, 9 Feb 2008 04:14:51 -0500 (EST))
When you reate the array its --chunk or -c -- I found 256 KiB to 1024 KiB
to be optimal.
Hello Justin,
what is your typical bonnie++ invocation, to test your configuratio
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> I am trying to get some order to linux raid info.
Help appreciated :)
> The list description at
> http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-raid
> does list af FAQ, http://www.linuxdoc.org/FAQ/
Yes, that should be amended. Drop them a line about the FAQ too
> So our
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 29 2008 18:08, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>>> IIRC there was a discussion a while back on renaming mdadm options
>>> (google "Time to deprecate old RAID formats?") and the superblocks
>>> to emphasise the location and data structure. Would it be good to
>>> introduce the
Dexter Filmore wrote:
> On Friday 08 February 2008 00:22:36 Neil Brown wrote:
>> On Thursday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 05 February 2008 03:02:00 Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday February 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seems the other topic wasn't quite clear...
not
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:05:13AM +, David Greaves wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>
> > The list description at
> > http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-raid
> > does list af FAQ, http://www.linuxdoc.org/FAQ/
> Yes, that should be amended. Drop them a line about the FAQ too
I wil
On Feb 10 2008 10:34, David Greaves wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jan 29 2008 18:08, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>
IIRC there was a discussion a while back on renaming mdadm options
(google "Time to deprecate old RAID formats?") and the superblocks
to emphasise the location and dat
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Feb 10 2008 10:34, David Greaves wrote:
>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> On Jan 29 2008 18:08, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>>
> IIRC there was a discussion a while back on renaming mdadm options
> (google "Time to deprecate old RAID formats?") and the superblocks
> to e
On Feb 10 2008 12:27, David Greaves wrote:
>>
>> I do not see anything wrong by specifying the SB location as a metadata
>> version. Why should not location be an element of the raid type?
>> It's fine the way it is IMHO. (Just the default is not :)
>
>There was quite a discussion about it.
>
>Fo
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> I would then like that to be reflected in the main page.
> I would rather that this be called "Howto and FAQ - Linux raid"
> than "Main Page - Linux Raid". Is that possible?
Just like C has a main() wiki's have a Main Page :)
I guess it could be changed but I think it
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 06:21:08PM +, David Greaves wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > I would then like that to be reflected in the main page.
> > I would rather that this be called "Howto and FAQ - Linux raid"
> > than "Main Page - Linux Raid". Is that possible?
>
> Just like C has a mai
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Feb 10 2008 12:27, David Greaves wrote:
I do not see anything wrong by specifying the SB location as a metadata
version. Why should not location be an element of the raid type?
It's fine the way it is IMHO. (Just the default is not :)
There was quite a discuss
11 matches
Mail list logo
