> Instead of applying this revert, I decided to just drop the original
> commit from my next branch.
H, yes, rebasing creates a clean history for occasions like this,
but makes working on your next-branch kinda complicated if the base I
merged has gone.
> While working on new version of how
On 3 August 2017 at 11:53, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> This reverts commit 785b215250310c690142abb1bdbb0767b8487c49. There is a
>> secondary SDHI instance on Gen2 with has a 32-bit wide SDBUF register
>> while all other registers are 16 bi
Tested this patch on iWave RZ/G1M platform.
Tested-by: Biju Das
Regards,
Biju
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com]
> Sent: 03 August 2017 10:50
> To: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org; Simon Horman ;
> Biju D
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> This reverts commit 785b215250310c690142abb1bdbb0767b8487c49. There is a
> secondary SDHI instance on Gen2 with has a 32-bit wide SDBUF register
> while all other registers are 16 bit apart. So, the logic used here does
> not apply and