Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>
> On 8/2/2010 2:12 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> >> On 8/2/2010 12:38 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >>> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> Hi, I came back from vacation.
>
> Do you have any feedback? If ok, i want to go to input tree or
> sam
Absurd !!!
Did you mentioned that samsung merge window over before?
why it's reminder mail? it's unilateral notification at this time.
In my feelings. only include the your side (LSI) patches and don't
include others (mobile). since it's not fit your taste.
Can you explain the difference between
On 8/2/2010 2:12 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> On 8/2/2010 12:38 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
Hi, I came back from vacation.
Do you have any feedback? If ok, i want to go to input tree or samsung
tree these added sched.h including.
>
Please remind following which is from discussion about Samsung merge stuff
with Russell.
---
> > So, please send the majority of patches *before* the merge window and
> > try to avoid sending anything but fixes during the merge window itself.
> > The merge window is for code which has _already_ b
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>
> Many MUX and clock dividers have a status bit so that users can wait
> until the status is stable. When corresponding registers are accessed
> while a clock is not stable, we may suffer from unexpected errors.
>
> Therefore, we introduce a mechanism to let the operations r
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>
> On 8/2/2010 12:38 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> >> Hi, I came back from vacation.
> >>
> >> Do you have any feedback? If ok, i want to go to input tree or samsung
> >> tree these added sched.h including.
> > I applied the patch adding samsu
On 8/2/2010 12:38 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hi, I came back from vacation.
>>
>> Do you have any feedback? If ok, i want to go to input tree or samsung
>> tree these added sched.h including.
> I applied the patch adding samsung-keypad.c and the platform data
>
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>
> Hi, I came back from vacation.
>
> Do you have any feedback? If ok, i want to go to input tree or samsung
> tree these added sched.h including.
> >>> I applied the patch adding samsung-keypad.c and the platform data
> >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/keyp
Hi, I came back from vacation.
Do you have any feedback? If ok, i want to go to input tree or samsung
tree these added sched.h including.
>>> I applied the patch adding samsung-keypad.c and the platform data
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/keypad.h and I expect that
>>> patches to
With this patch, clk_set_rate and clk_set_parent returns with stabilized
clocks for non-glitch muxs and divs.
This patch requires the following two patches.
1. V3 patch of "ARM: Samsung SoC: clksrc-clk: wait for the stable
SRC/DIV status.", which has stable SRC/DIV support for Samsung SoC.
2. "A
Many MUX and clock dividers have a status bit so that users can wait
until the status is stable. When corresponding registers are accessed
while a clock is not stable, we may suffer from unexpected errors.
Therefore, we introduce a mechanism to let the operations related with
updating SRC/DIV regi
MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>
> Early products of S5PV210, EVT0, had several errata that require
> kernel to avoid using some parts/instructions of the CPU or to
> add protection instructions. There are products with such early
> production CPUs; thus, we want to distinguish them in kernel.
> This patch i
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> Many MUX and clock dividers have a status bit so that users can wait
>> until the status is stable. When corresponding registers are accessed
>> while a clock is not stable, we may suffer from unexpected errors.
>>
>> T
13 matches
Mail list logo
