Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled

On 2014년 05월 22일 14:25, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi Inki, > > The below fix doesn't affect the FB dev buffer allocation. IMO the scenario > where u-boot allocates the buffer is not disturbed. > Please review the implementation. > Applied. Thanks, Inki Dae > Regards, > Rahul Sharma. > > On 7 May

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled

Thanks Sachin. On 22 May 2014 11:38, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > On 7 May 2014 17:21, Rahul Sharma wrote: >> From: Rahul Sharma >> >> Allow to allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled. >> Currently, it tries to allocates contigous buffer which consistently >> fail for large

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled

Hi Rahul, On 7 May 2014 17:21, Rahul Sharma wrote: > From: Rahul Sharma > > Allow to allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled. > Currently, it tries to allocates contigous buffer which consistently > fail for large buffers and then fall back to non contigous. Apart > from being slow,

Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled

Hi Inki, The below fix doesn't affect the FB dev buffer allocation. IMO the scenario where u-boot allocates the buffer is not disturbed. Please review the implementation. Regards, Rahul Sharma. On 7 May 2014 17:21, Rahul Sharma wrote: > From: Rahul Sharma > > Allow to allocate non-contigous bu

[PATCH] drm/exynos: allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled

From: Rahul Sharma Allow to allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled. Currently, it tries to allocates contigous buffer which consistently fail for large buffers and then fall back to non contigous. Apart from being slow, this implementation is also very noisy and fills the screen wit