Re: [PATCH 0/4] removal of extra abstraction layers

2014-12-08 Thread Gustavo Padovan
Hi Inki, 2014-12-06 Dave Airlie : > On 2 December 2014 at 22:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > Hi Inki, > > > > Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that sits > > on > > top of this one. Thanks. > > Inki, any plans on when you can get to looking at this? > > I think

Re: [PATCH 0/4] removal of extra abstraction layers

2014-12-05 Thread Dave Airlie
On 2 December 2014 at 22:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > Hi Inki, > > Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that sits on > top of this one. Thanks. Inki, any plans on when you can get to looking at this? I think cleaning up exynos so we can get atomic using it is somethi

Re: [PATCH 0/4] removal of extra abstraction layers

2014-12-02 Thread Gustavo Padovan
Hi Inki, Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that sits on top of this one. Thanks. Gustavo 2014-11-24 Gustavo Padovan : > From: Gustavo Padovan > > Hi Inki, > >

[PATCH 0/4] removal of extra abstraction layers

2014-11-24 Thread Gustavo Padovan
From: Gustavo Padovan Hi Inki, In this series I've removed some level of indirection from the exynos_drm_code. There two moves in these patches