Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mach-shmobile: Use common always on power domain governor

2011-12-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, December 04, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:31:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code, > > > this patch is deleting the shmobile specific

Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor

2011-12-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > Since systems are likely to have power domains that can't be turned off > for various reasons at least temporarily while implementing power domain > support provide a default governor which will always refuse to power off > the domain, saving plat

Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor

2011-12-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > Looks good with the new version of [2/3]. > Do you want me to takt it? It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third patch

Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor

2011-12-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > > > Looks good with the new version of [2/3]. > > > Do you want me to takt it? > > It m

Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Provide an always on power domain governor

2011-12-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:15:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third patch > > depends on it and there's some other stuff going on with the s3c64xx > > power management - so let's

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM Exynos4210-Nuri: remove compiler errors

2011-12-04 Thread MyungJoo Ham
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > MyungJoo Ham wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> > MyungJoo Hamm wrote: >> >> >> > What's the 'compiler errors'? >> > >> > And I don't know why this patch included in this series, maybe this >> should >> > be separa

RE: [PATCH V5] mmc: core: HS200 mode support for eMMC 4.5

2011-12-04 Thread Subhash Jadavani
> -Original Message- > From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananja...@linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:08 PM > To: Subhash Jadavani > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org; linux-samsung- > s...@vger.kernel.org; Chris Ball > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] mmc: core: HS2

RE: [PATCH V5] mmc: core: eMMC 4.5 Power Class Selection Feature

2011-12-04 Thread Subhash Jadavani
Hi Girish, > -Original Message- > From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Girish K S > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 8:42 PM > To: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: c...@laptop.org; kgene@samsung.com; patc...@linaro.org; linux- >

Re: [PATCH V5] mmc: core: HS200 mode support for eMMC 4.5

2011-12-04 Thread Girish K S
On 5 December 2011 11:46, Subhash Jadavani wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananja...@linaro.org] >> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:08 PM >> To: Subhash Jadavani >> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org; linux-samsung- >> s...@vger.kern