On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:24:08AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:04:39AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:15:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > SoC info is in compatible, so there's no reason to make it a property.
> > >
> > > that's why it woul
于 2017年6月15日 GMT+08:00 上午11:54:08, Vinod Koul 写到:
>On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:04:39AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:15:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > > SoC info is in compatible, so there's no reason to make it a
>property.
>> >
>> > that's why it would need to b
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:04:39AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:15:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > SoC info is in compatible, so there's no reason to make it a property.
> >
> > that's why it would need to be optional for the SoC's that needs these..
>
> There's no
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:15:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > SoC info is in compatible, so there's no reason to make it a property.
>
> that's why it would need to be optional for the SoC's that needs these..
There's nothing optional about that behaviour, it's mandatory for the
SoC that need i
于 2017年6月14日 GMT+08:00 下午4:45:29, Vinod Koul 写到:
>On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:32:57PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>
>>
>> 于 2017年6月14日 GMT+08:00 下午4:32:52, Vinod Koul
>写到:
>> >On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:33:47PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> From: Icenowy Zheng
>> >>
>> >> Originally we
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:32:57PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>
>
> 于 2017年6月14日 GMT+08:00 下午4:32:52, Vinod Koul 写到:
> >On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:33:47PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> From: Icenowy Zheng
> >>
> >> Originally we enable a special gate bit when the compatible indicates
> >>
于 2017年6月14日 GMT+08:00 下午4:32:52, Vinod Koul 写到:
>On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:33:47PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> From: Icenowy Zheng
>>
>> Originally we enable a special gate bit when the compatible indicates
>> A23/33.
>>
>> But according to BSP sources and user manuals, more SoCs will ne
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:33:47PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> From: Icenowy Zheng
>
> Originally we enable a special gate bit when the compatible indicates
> A23/33.
>
> But according to BSP sources and user manuals, more SoCs will need this
> gate bit.
>
> So make it a common quirk configur