On 2013-11-10, wrote:
> Professionally I’m back to working with a .NET technology stack, so
> I’ll also try find time to contribute to .NET OSS projects again.
very much looking forward to it.
Stefan
+1
Note: i have no Windows machine and was not able to verify building or other
technical checks. I have tested formal requirements though
On 10 Nov 2013, at 9:54, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> per discussion of the last few days we intend to cut a final(?) release
> from the 1.2.x branch
Stefan,
Thanks for the feedback, and thank you and Dominic for breathing new life into
log4net!
Professionally I’m back to working with a .NET technology stack, so I’ll also
try find time to contribute to .NET OSS projects again.
Gert
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Verzonden: zondag 10 novem
Great to see you here, Gert!
On 2013-11-10, wrote:
> no build for .NET 4.5, but I assume this was already discussed before
> and is planned for a subsequent release
We introduced the 4.0 builds in 2011 mainly because of the new security
model. Without that the 2.0 version worked just fine. In
+1
with following questions/remarks:
no build for .NET 4.5, but I assume this was already discussed before and is
planned for a subsequent release
do we position “net” binaries as targeting only MS .NET, or are they suppose to
be cross-CLR / cross-platform?
Van: Stefan Bodewig
Verzo
Hi all,
per discussion of the last few days we intend to cut a final(?) release
from the 1.2.x branch fixing some problems with the ILog extensions and
compilation for the compact framework.
log4net 1.2.13 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
