Hi,
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think we should create a section in the Sandbox just for
> different types of Analyzers.
Yes!
Pasha Bizhan
http://sf.net/projects/lucenedotnet
-
To un
name for this project and
Lucene is better.
Will the second edition of your book be titled "Search.Apache.Org in
Action"?-)
Also are your going to rename all namespaces from org.apache.lucene.* to
search.org.apache.*?
Etc..
Pasha Bizhan
---
Hi,
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Look at the other new top-level projects - db.apache.org,
> portals.apache.org, and logging.apache.org. Same idea applies there.
Exactly! Thank you.
Pasha Bizhan
http://lucened
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:35:07 +0100
Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like we should consider alternate names.
Suggestions??
ir.apache.org
retrieval.apache.org
textsearch.apache.org
searchengine.apache.org
Pasha
Hi,
> From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As for Lookout, Beagle, ets, I know for fact that Beagle,
> Ascirum and .Text are using dotLucene, I don't know about
> Lookout. Just do a Google them and you will see.
Lookout use Lucene.Net 1.3.3.1
Hi,
> From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The only problem would be if someone else felt that the name
> Lucene.Net was their property.
Read the license and look the source code.
Lucene.Net copyrighted to Apache Software Foundation.
Pasha Bizhan
http://lucened
