_
>> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
>> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>>
>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
>> Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.o
- lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-lvs-users--Real-Servers-receive-nothing-tp23717632p23734830.htm
poiuytrez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ok, but the packets does not seems to go to the realservers. There is no log
> entry in apache. So the gateway is not the main problem.
>
>
IP 101 is your friend. I mean, SYN packets probably reach the RS, but
because the ACK arrive out of context on the client, the
ists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-lvs-users--Real-Servers-receive-nothing-tp23717632p23719032.html
Sent from the LVS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Please read the do
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:04 +0800, Guillaume Charhon wrote:
> It does not work and I don't have any ideas how to debug that.
The default gateway for the realservers should be 10.8.10.1.
If the netmask for everything is 255.255.255.0 (/24) then they'll have
no idea how to route back to 10.8.8.85.
Hello,
I am trying to configure LVS on CentOS 5.3.
I have followed the tuturial LVS-NAT on
http://www.ultramonkey.org/papers/lvs_tutorial/html/
I have typed on the load balancer :
ifconfig eth0:0 10.8.8.85 netmask 255.255.255.0
ipvsadm -A -t 10.8.8.85:80
ipvsadm -a -t 10.8.8.85:80 -r 10.8.10.2:
