I read the article. It should be signed by you, Justin, not me.
Nothing survived from what I wrote.
Besides that, looks fine.
Cheers,
Sylvia.
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ma
On 01/29/2016 01:26 PM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> Hi all!
> According to myself, this article only needs a banner and it's ready
> to go. But I'd like to hear your thoughts. So here is the link to
> preview:
>
> https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=11754&preview_id=11754
Hi Sylvia,
Nice, this will make
Hi all!
According to myself, this article only needs a banner and it's ready
to go. But I'd like to hear your thoughts. So here is the link to
preview:
https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=11754&preview_id=11754
Thanks and cheers,
Sylvia
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
Li
Perfect! I'm finishing the banner. I'll send an email once I've got it done.
Cheers,
Sylvia
On 17/01/2016, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> On 01/17/2016 02:14 PM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
>> I'm doing so and I find Gthumb and Gwenview as good alternatives. Photos
>> is unusable. F-Spot isn't available in
On 01/17/2016 02:14 PM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
I'm doing so and I find Gthumb and Gwenview as good alternatives. Photos
is unusable. F-Spot isn't available in Fedora (any reasons…?).
So I'll write a bit about their features and differences with Shotwell
and between them.
Then a couple of screensho
I'm doing so and I find Gthumb and Gwenview as good alternatives. Photos is
unusable. F-Spot isn't available in Fedora (any reasons…?).
So I'll write a bit about their features and differences with Shotwell and
between them.
Then a couple of screenshots and it's done.
Cheers,
Sylvia
On Sunda
On 01/15/2016 12:58 PM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
Flory: I said about Digikam exactly the opposite. I said Digikam is
way more complicated and featured than Shotwell. They aren't
exchangeable.
Okay, thanks for the clarification. Seeing as how Charles has a lot
going on right now, that would be awe
I started adding text to the article. I think between Sunday and Monday it
will be ready.
Cheers,
Sylvia
On Friday, 15 January 2016, charles profitt wrote:
> Sylvia:
>
> That would be fantastic! Thanks.
>
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 03:33:55 -0800 *Sylvia Sánchez
> >*
> wrote
>
> If yo
OK. Then I'm installing some programmes today and let's see what I find.
Flory: I said about Digikam exactly the opposite. I said Digikam is
way more complicated and featured than Shotwell. They aren't
exchangeable.
Cheers,
Sylvia
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
List
Sylvia:
That would be fantastic! Thanks.
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 03:33:55 -0800 Sylvia Sánchez
wrote
If you're OK, I can research on possible Shotwell substitutes and
finish the article with that information.
Anyway, I must do that investigation, I'm a Shotwell fa
If you're OK, I can research on possible Shotwell substitutes and
finish the article with that information.
Anyway, I must do that investigation, I'm a Shotwell fan so I need to
find a good substitute ASAP.
Cheers,
Sylvia
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
List info or
Sorry about missing the meeting again everyone.
On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 21:29 -0500, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> With all of these things in mind, it would be nice to convert this
> article to an introduction in one of the alternative programs
> available in Fedora. Sylvia (lailah / Kohane) pointed
Hello all,
In the last ten minutes of the Magazine meeting today, we discussed the
status of the Shotwell article currently sitting in the Drafts category.
I think the last time we left off with it, its purpose and future were a
bit unclear. Now, we know some things to be true.
1
13 matches
Mail list logo