Re: Revamped Gnome.org

Richard Hoelscher a écrit : Long story short, for the purpose of front-page use, I'm all in favor of GNOME being described as "open source" software, not "Open Source", "Free Software" or "Open-Source Free Software". Use it as an adjective to get the point across that this is a community of goo

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

On 9/18/05, J.B. Nicholson-Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I thought that GNOME was the official desktop of the GNU Project, and thus hadto do with the free software movement, not the open source movement.  Looking at the Wikipedia reference you included, I see that GNOME actually predates thecoi

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

Andreas Nilsson wrote: "GNOME is an Open-Source Operating System built to be stable..." I think some people would not agree that GNOME is an Operating System. GNU/Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris are operating

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

rajiv vyas wrote: Instead of emails and abiword files going back and forth, should we move text editing to www.writely.com? I can invite the group or individual members? Of course, if it does not work or people find it inconvenient, we can move back to the old email/abiword way. Thanks, Rajiv

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

Instead of emails and abiword files going back and forth, should we move text editing to www.writely.com? I can invite the group or individual members? Of course, if it does not work or people find it inconvenient, we can move back to the old email/abiword way. Thanks, Rajiv -- marketing-list

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

rajiv vyas wrote: On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 19:45 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: On 9/13/05, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hugh Buzacott wrote: I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up. The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a fr

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 19:45 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > On 9/13/05, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hugh Buzacott wrote: > > > > > I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up. > > > > > > The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a front > > > pa

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

On 9/13/05, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hugh Buzacott wrote: > > > I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up. > > > > The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a front > > page but has links to the rest of normal GNOME.org through the header

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

Hugh Buzacott wrote: I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up. The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a front page but has links to the rest of normal GNOME.org through the header. It is just a suggestion so if you have any ideas and so forth just

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

Hugh Buzacott wrote: > I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up. Oh Goody... > The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a front > page but has links to the rest of normal GNOME.org through the header. > It is just a suggestion so if you have any ideas an

Re: Revamped Gnome.org

Hi! You may like to check http://live.gnome.org/MarketingTeam_2fWebsiteUpdates Scroll down for a draft of the web site structure. One important change is the seperation of a frontpage and what is now called 'user'. In your mockup, 'support' should thus point to support/. Additionally, the or

Revamped Gnome.org

I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up. The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a front page but has links to the rest of normal GNOME.org through the header. It is just a suggestion so if you have any ideas and so forth just send them. Thanks