>
>
> I can work on that and submit a PR.
>
I've submitted a PR (this is Work In Progress):
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/1647
I think ``get_sample_data`` should be moved to a public, documented module,
as, unlike other methods from the cbook module, it is meant for public use.
>
Hi all,
A while back, Mike drafted a MEP to modernize the documentation:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep10
The main idea behind this MEP is to use the full potential of new tools and
conventions available for sphinx, to make the documentation more readable,
maintainable and con
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Nelle Varoquaux
wrote:
>
> - use the autodoc_docstring_signature of sphinx 1.1, which allow to have
> the explicit function signature instead of the python one in the generated
> documentation (args* and **kwargs are replaced by the explicits arguments)
>
>
If you ha
On 01/09/2013 12:43 PM, Todd wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Nelle Varoquaux
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
- use the autodoc_docstring_signature of sphinx 1.1, which allow
to have the explicit function signature instead of the python one
in the generated documenta
On 01/09/2013 12:20 PM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote:
Hi all,
A while back, Mike drafted a MEP to modernize the documentation:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep10
The main idea behind this MEP is to use the full potential of new
tools and conventions available for sphinx, to make the
We have too many pull requests stacking up. As an easy way to deal with
two of them, does anyone strenuously object to merging #1599 and closing
#1581? There are no comments on #1599.
Eric
--
Master Visual Studio, Sha
