+1. I've been traveling through California the last few days.
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.m
Mike Moulton wrote:
I'm all for a repackaging. While were at it, are there any other changes
that have been lingering that could get incorporated into a new release.
Personally there are a few things I have intended to look into. Most
notably I want to add support for Xalan's XSLTC in the XSL tr
s...
--jim
- Original Message -
From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 4:17 PM
Subject: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.mav.*
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Schnitzer, Je
> +1 from me too, though we might take a vote
> from the larger community on this one. A lot
> of people's code is gonna stop compiling when
> the package for ThrowawayBean2 changes...
It depends on how developer has written he's code. I almost always do it
by at first extending one class that ope
TECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 4:17 PM
Subject: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.mav.*
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Schnitzer, Jeff wrote:
> > FWIW, I'd like to see everything migrated over to net.sf.mav.*
> > eventua
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Schnitzer, Jeff wrote:
FWIW, I'd like to see everything migrated over to net.sf.mav.*
eventually. It would be a pretty big PITA though. Not sure how
worthwhile it would be to move the core.
If there were interest, I'd be glad to volunteer for the grunt
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Schnitzer, Jeff wrote:
> > FWIW, I'd like to see everything migrated over to net.sf.mav.*
> > eventually. It would be a pretty big PITA though. Not sure how
> > worthwhile it would be to move the core.
>
> If there were interest, I'd be glad to v
