Kenneth Graunke writes:
> We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and
> never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF
> cache bugs was to relocate vertex buffers to the low 4GB, so we'd never
> have addresses that alias in the low 32 bits. But th
Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 09:06:49)
> On Thursday, May 3, 2018 11:49:51 PM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 02:12:38)
> > > We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and
> > > never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing wit
On Thursday, May 3, 2018 11:49:51 PM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 02:12:38)
> > We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and
> > never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF
> > cache bugs was to relocate vertex buff
Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2018-05-04 02:12:38)
> We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and
> never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF
> cache bugs was to relocate vertex buffers to the low 4GB, so we'd never
> have addresses that alias in the
We'd like to start using soft-pin to assign BO addresses up front, and
never move them again. Our previous plan for dealing with 48-bit VF
cache bugs was to relocate vertex buffers to the low 4GB, so we'd never
have addresses that alias in the low 32 bits. But that requires moving
buffers dynamic
