[uf-discuss] hAtom 0.2 (was: a question about concatenation...)

2007-06-02 Thread David Janes
On 6/1/07, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 1, 2007, at 10:59 AM, David Janes wrote: > I concur. Time to start ramping up for hAtom 0.2, if I can get some > blocks of free time. I'm more than willing to help. I have time to spend on it right now. I'll work on collecting issues to deal

Re: [uf-discuss] a question about concatenation and hAtom entry content

2007-06-02 Thread David Janes
On 6/2/07, Ben Wiley Sittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: why not do this for the entry title, too? accroding to the atom spec, this can contain markup too (and in my experience, often does.) entry-title _does_ include the HTML -- it's just markup on a DOM node; there is nothing in the spec that

Re: [uf-discuss] a question about concatenation and hAtom entry content

2007-06-02 Thread Ben Wiley Sittler
On 6/1/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/1/07, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 31, 2007, at 11:29 AM, David Janes wrote: > > > On 5/31/07, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Another option is that entry content is: > >> > >> Content > >> More Content > >> >

Re: [uf-discuss] a question about concatenation and hAtom entry content

2007-06-02 Thread Ben Wiley Sittler
On 6/2/07, Ben Wiley Sittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/1/07, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/1/07, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 31, 2007, at 11:29 AM, David Janes wrote: > > > > > On 5/31/07, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Another option i