Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Kai Tietz
2015-01-06 13:26 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : > On 01/06/15 12:49, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : >>> On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: > On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: >> Maybe I missed s

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/06/15 12:49, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : >> On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: >>> Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: > Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perf

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Kai Tietz
2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : > On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: >> Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: >>> On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and I'm not sure what we should d

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: >> On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: >>> Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and >>> I'm not sure what we should do about it. Solution 2. seems the least >>> p

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-05 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: > On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: > > Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and > > I'm not sure what we should do about it. Solution 2. seems the least > > problematic. > > Looking deeper at this, current

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-05 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: > Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and > I'm not sure what we should do about it. Solution 2. seems the least > problematic. Looking deeper at this, current implementation has one more problem. We can't really have localtim

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-04 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi Erik, On 03/01/15 23:24, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Sandro Mani schreef op za 03-01-2015 om 22:24 [+0100]: mingw-poppler-0.28.1-1 ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass rebuild ** Package owner: smani Time to build: 2 minutes,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 01/03/2015 01:43 PM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > mingw-libmicrohttpd-0.9.34-3 > ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass > rebuild ** > Package owner: mooninite > Time to build: 9 seconds > Build > logs:http://build1.vanpienbroek.nl/fedora-

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Sandro Mani schreef op za 03-01-2015 om 22:24 [+0100]: > >> mingw-poppler-0.28.1-1 > >>** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass > >> rebuild ** > >>Package owner: smani > >>Time to build: 2 minutes, 25 seconds > >>Build logs: > >> http://build1.vanpie

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread LRN
On 03.01.2015 23:07, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Erik van Pienbroek schreef op za 03-01-2015 om 20:43 [+0100]: >> mingw-libmicrohttpd-0.9.34-3 >> ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass >> rebuild ** >> Package owner: mooninite >> Time to build: 9 seco

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Erik van Pienbroek schreef op za 03-01-2015 om 20:43 [+0100]: > The following packages FAILED to rebuild: > > mingw-cairo-1.14.0-1 > ** Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass > rebuild ** > Package owner: rjones > Time to build: 1 minute, 32 seconds

[Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-03 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
This is a report for the 20150103 mass rebuild of all Fedora MinGW packages against Fedora Rawhide and a list of all the changes which have been applied since the previous mass rebuild. During this mass rebuild the following toolchain was used: * mingw-w64 git f7337b 20141222 trunk snapshot * bin