Hi Benjamin,
The point of interest is which compiler offers technological advantage
without limitations and dependency. It is not the trendy product that
retains users base, it's the more accessible, reliable and permissive.
Theo said it: the moral values have been double (corporate) mortgaged.
Hi,
I'm thinking of buying a new toy board like BeagleBone Black to test the armv7
port.
It's already possible to do full disk encryption on these boards?
Also, as a side question, I remember some discussion here on misc or tech,
about no
support for binary packages on armv7 port. Is it still ri
> And that is because corporate "contributor-wannabes" put pressure on the
> LLVM foundation.
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html
>
> It does say "this is an RFC" but that was last year. We are now in this
> year:
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-Sept
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:29:56 -0500
Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Chris Cappuccio
> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote:
> > > Hi Benjamin,
> > >
> > > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400:
> > >
> > > > What does the OpenB
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> >
> > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400:
> >
> > > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move
> > > to the Apache license?
Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400:
>
> > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move
> > to the Apache license?
> >
> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/10477
On September 27, 2016 10:06:24 PM GMT+02:00, Marco Prause
wrote:
>Re,
>
>well as mentioned fstat didn't show any open filehandles or inodes, but
>fsck was a bit more chatty :
>
># fsck /dev/sd0a
>
>
>** /dev/rsd0a (NO WRITE)
>** Last Mounted on /flash
>** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
>** Phase
Yes. Yes it is, and he's trying to get OpenBSD running on top of
Libreboot, which makes it very much relevant. PAY ATTENTION!
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Dude, this is OpenBSD's mailing list not libreboot's. Pay attention, please!
>
--
http://apgwoz.com
Re,
well as mentioned fstat didn't show any open filehandles or inodes, but
fsck was a bit more chatty :
# fsck /dev/sd0a
** /dev/rsd0a (NO WRITE)
** Last Mounted on /flash
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Refere
Hi Benjamin,
kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400:
> What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move
> to the Apache license?
>
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/104778.html
If LLVM would move to the Apache 2 license, we w
Dude, this is OpenBSD's mailing list not libreboot's. Pay attention, please!
Hi Rob,
Rob Pierce wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:31:41AM -0400:
> Stumbled across these in my travels.
Committed, thanks.
Ingo
> Index: man4/hifn.4
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/hifn.4,v
> retrieving revision 1.50
On 2016-09-27, Marko Cupać wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what would be the 'industry standard' for ipsec crypto transforms today?
> Should I consider my tunnel safe with hmac-sha1 / aes-128 / group 2? Or
> should I bump it all the way to hmac-sha-512 / aes-256 / group 18?
> Something in between?
I don't know
Hi,
what would be the 'industry standard' for ipsec crypto transforms today?
Should I consider my tunnel safe with hmac-sha1 / aes-128 / group 2? Or
should I bump it all the way to hmac-sha-512 / aes-256 / group 18?
Something in between?
Thank you in advance.
--
Before enlightenment - chop wood,
And finally,
Conclusion.
(A: Section 6 below: Why is the system uptime string not displayed when the
cgi script is run under chroot?)
/bin/sh is needed at chroot for command interpretation.
(B: Section 4 below: Why does running uptime program under chroot yield
time
that is not accurate? 6:54P
No, there are no links and process that have the files opened.
Or better : I do not see any with fstat.
Maybe there's any other programs for this purpose I do not know at the
moment ?
Am 27. September 2016 08:29:06 MESZ, schrieb Raul Miller
:
Do any processes have those files open? Did you
16 matches
Mail list logo