Re: LLVM license change

2016-09-27 Thread lists
Hi Benjamin, The point of interest is which compiler offers technological advantage without limitations and dependency. It is not the trendy product that retains users base, it's the more accessible, reliable and permissive. Theo said it: the moral values have been double (corporate) mortgaged.

FDE on BeagleBone Black

2016-09-27 Thread L.R. D.S.
Hi, I'm thinking of buying a new toy board like BeagleBone Black to test the armv7 port. It's already possible to do full disk encryption on these boards? Also, as a side question, I remember some discussion here on misc or tech, about no support for binary packages on armv7 port. Is it still ri

Re: LLVM license change

2016-09-27 Thread Theo de Raadt
> And that is because corporate "contributor-wannabes" put pressure on the > LLVM foundation. > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html > > It does say "this is an RFC" but that was last year. We are now in this > year: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-Sept

Re: LLVM license change

2016-09-27 Thread bytevolcano
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:29:56 -0500 Amit Kulkarni wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Chris Cappuccio > wrote: > > > Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote: > > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > > > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400: > > > > > > > What does the OpenB

Re: LLVM license change

2016-09-27 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote: > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400: > > > > > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move > > > to the Apache license?

Re: LLVM license change

2016-09-27 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Ingo Schwarze [schwa...@usta.de] wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400: > > > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move > > to the Apache license? > > > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/10477

Re: No free discspace after deleting files

2016-09-27 Thread Alexander Hall
On September 27, 2016 10:06:24 PM GMT+02:00, Marco Prause wrote: >Re, > >well as mentioned fstat didn't show any open filehandles or inodes, but >fsck was a bit more chatty : > ># fsck /dev/sd0a > > >** /dev/rsd0a (NO WRITE) >** Last Mounted on /flash >** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes >** Phase

Re: dmesg for Lenovo Thinkpad x200 w/Libreboot

2016-09-27 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Yes. Yes it is, and he's trying to get OpenBSD running on top of Libreboot, which makes it very much relevant. PAY ATTENTION! On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Dude, this is OpenBSD's mailing list not libreboot's. Pay attention, please! > -- http://apgwoz.com

Re: No free discspace after deleting files

2016-09-27 Thread Marco Prause
Re, well as mentioned fstat didn't show any open filehandles or inodes, but fsck was a bit more chatty : # fsck /dev/sd0a ** /dev/rsd0a (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /flash ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Refere

Re: LLVM license change

2016-09-27 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Benjamin, kbenjamin Coplon wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:23:43PM -0400: > What does the OpenBSD community think about the LLVM proposal to move > to the Apache license? > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/104778.html If LLVM would move to the Apache 2 license, we w

Re: dmesg for Lenovo Thinkpad x200 w/Libreboot

2016-09-27 Thread Mihai Popescu
Dude, this is OpenBSD's mailing list not libreboot's. Pay attention, please!

Re: missing punctuation in hifn.4 and hardclock.9

2016-09-27 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Rob, Rob Pierce wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:31:41AM -0400: > Stumbled across these in my travels. Committed, thanks. Ingo > Index: man4/hifn.4 > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/hifn.4,v > retrieving revision 1.50

Re: recommended crypto transforms?

2016-09-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016-09-27, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > > what would be the 'industry standard' for ipsec crypto transforms today? > Should I consider my tunnel safe with hmac-sha1 / aes-128 / group 2? Or > should I bump it all the way to hmac-sha-512 / aes-256 / group 18? > Something in between? I don't know

recommended crypto transforms?

2016-09-27 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi, what would be the 'industry standard' for ipsec crypto transforms today? Should I consider my tunnel safe with hmac-sha1 / aes-128 / group 2? Or should I bump it all the way to hmac-sha-512 / aes-256 / group 18? Something in between? Thank you in advance. -- Before enlightenment - chop wood,

Re: Displaying System Uptime via CGI script: not displayed when script is run under chroot.

2016-09-27 Thread Kihaguru Gathura
And finally, Conclusion. (A: Section 6 below: Why is the system uptime string not displayed when the cgi script is run under chroot?) /bin/sh is needed at chroot for command interpretation. (B: Section 4 below: Why does running uptime program under chroot yield time that is not accurate? 6:54P

Re: No free discspace after deleting files

2016-09-27 Thread Marco Prause
No, there are no links and process that have the files opened. Or better : I do not see any with fstat. Maybe there's any other programs for this purpose I do not know at the moment ? Am 27. September 2016 08:29:06 MESZ, schrieb Raul Miller : Do any processes have those files open? Did you