NFS mapall (OpenBSD 5.1)

Hi, I have configured NFS on my server (10.17.170.126 OpenBSD 5.1). Here is my /etc/exports: /data/ftp/vsftpd/D01 -alldirs -mapall=ftpadm 10.16.128.129 10.16.10.175 (I have tested -maproot and/or without -alldirs, but I have experienced the same problem). Here is the directory: # ls -l

NIC is not recognized.

Hi, I am trying to install OpenBSD 4.2 on a HP Compaq dc7800. After the installation is complete, ifconfig doesn't show any NICs other than lo0 and enc0. The output of dmesg has a line: vendor Intel, unknown product 0x10bd (class network subclass ethernet, rev 0x02) at pci0 dev 25 function 0 not

Shared library without SHARED_LIBS:

Hi, I use an application which needs mysql version 4.1! My OpenBSD version is 3.9 (which has mysql version 5). Tried to install the 3.8 package. Didn't work since the 3.8 packages are linked against 3.8 libraries. Next installed 3.8 ports.tar.gz on my 3.9 OpenBSD, and tried make build

Re: Shared library without SHARED_LIBS:

Just a correction: Build works OK. It is the install (make install key=mysql-server-4.0.24p1) which produces the error! Regards, H. Badbanchi -Original Message- From: Badbanchi Hossein Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:04 To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Shared library without

Re: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC

Thanks everybody for helpful hints. Dear Brad, This morning downloaded the latest i386 snapshot and installed it. Although I still get the error message firmware handshake timed out, but after the machine boots, the NIC speed is OK. Thanks for your engagement. Regards, Amir

Re: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC

:28:20 susrocdns2 savecore: no core dump Regards, Amir -Original Message- From: Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 23:28 To: Badbanchi Hossein Subject: Re: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC Ok thanks. I think another developer mentioned something similar to this awhile

Re: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC

To: Badbanchi Hossein Cc: misc Subject: Re: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC On 2/3/06, Badbanchi Hossein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This morning I installed the kernel from the snapshot. The only (cosmetic) difference is that the time-out values are reduced, so it doesn't take that long as before

Re: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC

Either continue with today updates, or wait a few more days for a new snapshot, but the fixes are NOT in the snapshot you installed. A Trust me! Brad fixed them all and it is fast! But not in the snapshot yet, sorry. Thanks for the clue. I just looked at the snapshot directory and the file

Broadcom BCM5752 NIC

Hi, Have recently got an HP Compaq dc7600 to be used as DHCP Server. OpenBSD 3.8 install couldn't properly work with the Broadcom BCM5752 NIC! The Error says: bge0: firmware handshake timed out After installation was complete, now each time I reboot the system it takes a long time for the

Re: MAC filter Bridge

products like CounterAct from ForeScout and the like. Amir -Original Message- From: Tobias Weingartner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 20:40 To: Badbanchi Hossein Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: MAC filter Bridge On Wednesday, February 1, Badbanchi Hossein

Re: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC

assistance. Amir -Original Message- From: Badbanchi Hossein Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 19:36 To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Broadcom BCM5752 NIC Hi, Have recently got an HP Compaq dc7600 to be used as DHCP Server. OpenBSD 3.8 install couldn't properly work with the Broadcom BCM5752 NIC

MAC filter Bridge

Hi, I am trying to implement a MAC filter, based on OpenBSD Bridging facilities. One can read in BRCONFIG(8) man page: rule [rulespec] Add a filtering rule to an interface. Rules have a similar syn- tax to those in pf.conf(5). Rules can be used to selectively

Re: MAC filter Bridge

Hi, An alternative approach might be to turn off learning and discovery on the interface and add MAC addresses that are allowed to communicate statically. As a matter of fact I can add MACs supposed to be reached from each interface of the bridge, at the same time I update Bridge Rules. But this

Re: MAC filter Bridge

Don't you already have problems if you have 20,000 nodes communicating on one flat broadcast domain already? OK. I was exaggerating! I have a little more than 2100 MACs. But even with this number, a sequential search doesn't seem to be acceptable. Regards, Amir

Re: MAC filter Bridge

Basing security policies on something as easily changable as a MAC address (and as public as a MAC address) is stupid. Thanks for the complement. Although this might seem (or actually BE) stupid in environments publicly accessible, but for a closed environment like our company LAN, this is

MAC based rules in Bridge config

Hi, In patched Linux versions, one can add or remove MAC based filter rules from the interfaces taking part in a bridge. In OpenBSD (according to the man page of brconfig(8)) one can add rules, but there is no (documented) way to delete rules! In order to delete a certain rule, the only

Re: MAC based rules in Bridge config

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Wittmayer Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 12:58 To: Badbanchi Hossein Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: MAC based rules in Bridge config Hi, i've listed all allowed MACs in a File and if one MAC changes i'll edit the file and reload the Bridge-Rules by following script

Re: pf by mac address?

Hi, If you don't want the hostile users know that you are shaping their packets in the way to Internet, you might want to make use of the Bridge facilities in OpenBSD. There you can tag the packets merely based on their MAC, and then in higher layers have pf deal with those packets as you

Trunks Bridges

Hi, Can someone please shed some light on the interoperability of the new trunk facility of 3.8 with the bridge functionality. In other words can we group bridged interfaces in trunks to achieve throughput enhancements? Thanks and Regards, H. Badbanchi

Re: Trunks Bridges

Trunking does not yet support link aggregation, or failover. So, no not yet. Thanks for the clear answer. Specially for mentioning the failover case. Regards, H. Badbanchi

Bridge with three IFs

Hi list! I sent the following email on Saturday. Just thought maybe it was because of weekend that I got no feedback! Will try my luck one last time, and already apologize for this. Hi, I want to implement an OpenBSD based bridge with three interfaces (and a fourth one only for management

Bridge with three IFs

Sorry to re-send this email. My first emain was sent before my subscription was complete! So I couldn't receive any answer (if any). Hi, I want to implement an OpenBSD based bridge with three interfaces (and a fourth one only for management access). The bridge should dispatch the incoming

Bridge with three IFs

Hi, I want to implement an OpenBSD based bridge with three interfaces (and a fourth one only for management access). The bridge should dispatch the incoming traffic on eth0 to either eth1 or eth2 based on the MAC Address of the ingress packet. If the sender's MAC address is **known** (already