Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Noah Pugsley
Bret S. Lambert wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:05:51PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: Bret S. Lambert wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:47:37AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: Oohhh... One dollar... But, hey, wait a minute... You still owe me a jager bomb since... s2k8? I'll update my accounti

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Michal
How dare she...you'd only be thinking about it ;) -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Matt Bettinger Sent: 18 September 2009 15:39 To: Michael Cc: m...@cvs.openbsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1 On 9/18/09, Michael

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Matt Bettinger
On 9/18/09, Michael wrote: > >>> Heh. I just cannot help being a little amused by this, since we are > >>> expecting our second kid with an ETA of Nov 1, and I thought it would > >>> have been a fun coincidence to have OpenBSD and (possibly) a kid > >>> "released" the same day. :-) > >> > >> don't

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Michael
>>> Heh. I just cannot help being a little amused by this, since we are >>> expecting our second kid with an ETA of Nov 1, and I thought it would >>> have been a fun coincidence to have OpenBSD and (possibly) a kid >>> "released" the same day. :-) >> >> don't name it puffy, please ;) >> > > Don't

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:15:33PM +0200, Bret S. Lambert wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:05:51PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > Bret S. Lambert wrote: > > >On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:47:37AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > > >>Oohhh... One dollar... > > >> > > >>But, hey, wait a minute... You

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:05:51PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: > Bret S. Lambert wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:47:37AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > >>Oohhh... One dollar... > >> > >>But, hey, wait a minute... You still owe me a jager bomb since... s2k8? > >> > >>I'll update my accounting,

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Siegbert Marschall
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:18:30AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:09 +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: >> > Theo de Raadt wrote: >> > > The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. >> > >> > Heh. I just cannot help being a little amused by this, since we are >> > expectin

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Gilles Chehade
Bret S. Lambert wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:47:37AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: Oohhh... One dollar... But, hey, wait a minute... You still owe me a jager bomb since... s2k8? I'll update my accounting, should we name it Puffy. ;-) I owe you what I say I owe you. Now fetch me

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:47:37AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > Oohhh... One dollar... > > But, hey, wait a minute... You still owe me a jager bomb since... s2k8? > > I'll update my accounting, should we name it Puffy. ;-) > I owe you what I say I owe you. Now fetch me some pickled fish.

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Alexander Hall
Bret S. Lambert wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:18:30AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:09 +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: >>> Theo de Raadt wrote: The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. >>> Heh. I just cannot help being a little amused by this, since we are

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:18:30AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:09 +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. > > > > Heh. I just cannot help being a little amused by this, since we are > > expecting our s

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Stephan A. Rickauer
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:09 +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. > > Heh. I just cannot help being a little amused by this, since we are > expecting our second kid with an ETA of Nov 1, and I thought it would > have been a fun coincide

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-18 Thread Alexander Hall
Theo de Raadt wrote: > The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. Heh. I just cannot help being a little amused by this, since we are expecting our second kid with an ETA of Nov 1, and I thought it would have been a fun coincidence to have OpenBSD and (possibly) a kid "released" the same day. :-)

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-17 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Can anyone point me in the direction of getting the release ISO for > those of us that have ordered CDs? If you have ordered one, it will arrive just before Nov 1. Until then, sorry, nope > Thanks to all of the obsd ninjas...you guys are awesome. I'm pushing > at our next blood cycle for

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-17 Thread Nate Schmoll
Can anyone point me in the direction of getting the release ISO for those of us that have ordered CDs? Thanks to all of the obsd ninjas...you guys are awesome. I'm pushing at our next blood cycle for a $10k contribution. We'll find out at the end of the month. Thanks to Theo and everyon

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-17 Thread Aaron Mason
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:44 AM, neal hogan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:41:12PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. >> >> There have had serious CD production problems. Because everything in >> CD manufacturing is so ridiculously outsourced, all I k

Re: 4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-17 Thread neal hogan
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:41:12PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. > > There have had serious CD production problems. Because everything in > CD manufacturing is so ridiculously outsourced, all I know is that the > plant which was used this time (Q Media

4.6 postponed to Nov 1

2009-09-17 Thread Theo de Raadt
The 4.6 release will be postponed to Nov 1. There have had serious CD production problems. Because everything in CD manufacturing is so ridiculously outsourced, all I know is that the plant which was used this time (Q Media services Corp in Vancouver) have made about 6 faulty CD pressings in a ro