Version 1040 was commited by markb on 2009-05-21 23:24:43 +0100 (Thu, 21 May
2009)
Add support for reversed one way streets specified with oneway=-1.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/m
Version 1039 was commited by markb on 2009-05-21 23:24:39 +0100 (Thu, 21 May
2009)
Add --ignore-maxspeeds option to cause maxspeed tags to be ignored.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/
Hi Marco,
> I guess "commit" means putting the patch in the mainstream mkgmap. Well if
> you do that and I can download the new version of mkgmap with the --
> ignore-maxspeed switch, I'll test it immediately with my style and I'll send
> back the results (mainly the changes in routing and ETA
Hi,
I guess "commit" means putting the patch in the mainstream mkgmap. Well if you
do that and I can download the new version of mkgmap with the --
ignore-maxspeed switch, I'll test it immediately with my style and I'll send
back the results (mainly the changes in routing and ETA).
Marco.
--
From the various posts on this topic, I get the impression that there
is much more to this business than just zapping the maxspeed tags.
Why don't those people who care about this stuff work out what is really
required and either come up with a concrete proposal as to how it
should be done, or e
x27;s always going to be a very rough estimate. Let's not get too
worked up about these details yet!
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of vi
Hi Thilo,
> So if you like to integrate the switch for
> the maxspeed handling into the trunk I will be happy, but I also
> understand that you might not want mkgmap to be cluttered with lots of
> "special options".
Well, I don't have a problem with lots of options so I am happy to
commit
0> In article <212454.24051...@web28515.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>,
0> Marco Certelli mailto:marco_certe...@yahoo.it> ("Marco") wrote:
Marco> 1st: I do not know very well how to keep the answer in the same
Marco> thread...
Just follow-up in the normal way (sometimes called "group reply" or
"reply to all
Hi Greg Troxel
1st: I do not know very well how to keep the answer in the same thread...
anyway,
I do not think there is a simple way to hard-code a proper speed of a road that
is right for all cases (expecially if it is indifferentiated for all highway
types).
I can speed on a city road at
Marco Certelli writes:
> I just would like to keep control over the map generation. For
> example: in Italy the maxspeed out of the city is 90km/h. It applies
> to unclassified roads up to trunk roads (well, some trunks has 110
> km/h).
>
> I would like to code in the map in a way that a tertiar
Hi, and thaks for your answer.
I'm not a developer so I really have some problem in applying the patch
locally...
I just would like to keep control over the map generation. For example: in
Italy the maxspeed out of the city is 90km/h. It applies to unclassified roads
up to trunk roads (well, s
Hi Mark,
It occurs to me that some people will want the maxspeed tag to
override
the speed code in the rules file (obviously, the person who wrote that
code thought it was a good idea) but others, like Marco, would prefer
not to have that feature. So, I guess, we need (yet another) option to
c
Hi Thilo,
> the relationship between the maxspeed tag and the road_speed is
> hardcoded in mkgmap. This is reasonable in general, because otherwise
> the style files had to be much larger to cover all the possible
> road_speeds per road. But if you want to use the road_speed in a
> creati
13 matches
Mail list logo
