Re: mod_perl2 & DBD::Oracle problem

2002-08-01 Thread Atsushi Fujita
Hi Stas, > Do you suggest that %ENV is getting lost along the way? Or can it be > some other problem? I don't have Oracle to test with. Or can you think > of some other way to reproduce the problem without depending on Oracle > being installed? I think this reason is my configuration or DBI/DBD

Thanks for the help

2002-08-01 Thread Rod Butcher
Thanks for the help I've got from this list over the past few years, esp. Randy Kobes. I won't be involved with mod_perl in the foreseeable future but it was fun being here. regards, Rod

Re: No error log, no database

2002-08-01 Thread Stas Bekman
Joachim Zobel wrote: > > Hi. > > Yesterday it happened that our error log reached 2Gb. Since ours is a > linux box writing to it stopped. At the same time all database driven > functionality stopped working (Plain DBI on Mysql, no Apache::DBI). The > database was still usable through the PHP

can't fine ModuleConfig.c.

2002-08-01 Thread Goehring, Chuck Mr., RCI - San Diego
Please disregard other messages. This is the one I'm stuck on. Everything builds except the ModuleConfig.c.

RE: Building with VC++ neads awk???

2002-08-01 Thread Goehring, Chuck Mr., RCI - San Diego
Got past that one. Now it can't fine ModuleConfig.c. Seams to be the same problem but all the rest worked after doing perl makefile.pl and nmake install (why isn't this nmake prep?) Please help -Original Message- From: Goehring, Chuck Mr., RCI - San Diego Sent: Thursday, August 01

Re: ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.12

2002-08-01 Thread Perrin Harkins
Dave Rolsky wrote: > It can, but I'm not sure what to update it to. Frankly, I think CPAN is > more at fault here given that _many_ people use CVS for this sort of stuff > and this quite normal when using CVS. This is a common complaint about CPAN.pm, but it's kept this way so far because of pe

aphid 0.17a

2002-08-01 Thread Pete
Version 0.17a of aphid, the web-based Perl/Apache/SSL installer is now available at sourceforge: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/aphid 0.17a 08/01/2002 Changed software_list.text to download Perl 5.8.0, URI 1.20, HTML::Parser 3.26, libnet 1.12, Digest::MD5 2.20, libwww 5.65, Apache 1

Building with VC++ neads awk???

2002-08-01 Thread Goehring, Chuck Mr., RCI - San Diego
To all, Trying to hurriedly build mod_perl 1.27 and Apache 1.3.26. Getting error bulding mod_perl like at the bottom of this message. I think this is because awk is needed to convert the .xs files to .c(). Can't remember how to put this in in VC++. It was somewhere in one of he instruct

Re: ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.12

2002-08-01 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DR" == Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DR> See, that's the problem. We're up in the hundreds. Maybe we should've DR> started formatting these with '%04d' way back when but that certainly DR> wouldn't help now. How 'bout removing Mason 1.05 from CPAN? Or are there too many apps

[OT] Re: ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.12

2002-08-01 Thread David Wheeler
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 02:11 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: > See, that's the problem. We're up in the hundreds. Maybe we should've > started formatting these with '%04d' way back when but that certainly > wouldn't help now. I've given up on letting CVS set $VERSION, for just this reason. It

Re: ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.12

2002-08-01 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, David Wheeler wrote: > No, CVS is kind-of brain-dead about this. I suggest you use sprintf to > properly format the version number with appropriate number of 0s. > > Although, with those version numbers, it might be a little late. See, that's the problem. We're up in the hun

No error log, no database

2002-08-01 Thread Joachim Zobel
Hi. Yesterday it happened that our error log reached 2Gb. Since ours is a linux box writing to it stopped. At the same time all database driven functionality stopped working (Plain DBI on Mysql, no Apache::DBI). The database was still usable through the PHP admin interface. The filesystem wa

Re: ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.12

2002-08-01 Thread David Wheeler
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 01:43 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: > It can, but I'm not sure what to update it to. Frankly, I think CPAN is > more at fault here given that _many_ people use CVS for this sort of stuff > and this quite normal when using CVS. No, CVS is kind-of brain-dead about this.

Re: [Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user?

2002-08-01 Thread Tim Tompkins
> ... It does cost an extra database write on each request > though, to keep the "last activity" time up to date. Unless you maintain a timestamp in the cookie and hash it with the session id (or whatever sensitive info you're hashing). Regards, Tim Tompkins ---

Re: ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.12

2002-08-01 Thread Dave Rolsky
On 1 Aug 2002, Vivek Khera wrote: > Cool... I just updated one system from 1.05 to 1.1201 and cpan says > that HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler is now older than the version in 1.05: > > Package namespace installedlatest in CPAN file > HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler 1.242 1.68 J/JS/J

Re: ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.12

2002-08-01 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DR" == Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DR> This release has a number of important improvements and it is highly DR> recommended that anyone use Mason 1.10 or 1.11 upgrade immediately in DR> order to fix a nasty memory leak in ApacheHandler. 1.12 is also quite a DR> bit faster than

Re: [Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user?

2002-08-01 Thread jjore
Oh yes, changing IPs. I hear that WebTV terminals may have different IP addresses per each HTTP request. I suppose the specific behaviour you want on the event 'user A at station A is authenticated. user A at station B attempts to authenticate'. I handle that by expiring the original session a

Re: [Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user?

2002-08-01 Thread wsheldah
The drawback could probably be at least partially mitigated with an inactivity timeout. When they attempt to login, you check both the flag and the last time you heard from them. If they had timed out, then you log them out and let them go ahead and try to log in. It does cost an extra database

Re: [Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user?

2002-08-01 Thread Robert Landrum
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:08:40PM -0400, Baljit Sethi wrote: > Hello. > > I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction. > > What I want to do is limit client logons to one logon per username ie while > a client has a session open, he/she cannot logon to the website from another >

Re: [Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user?

2002-08-01 Thread jjore
This isn't strictly a mod_perl thing but this is probably the safest way to make this happen. This happens to be how I've created a secure (by my definition. correct me if I get something wrong) web application. Pipe everything through an SSL tunnel The initial logon is username + password. A

Re: [Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user?

2002-08-01 Thread Perrin Harkins
Baljit Sethi wrote: > What I want to do is limit client logons to one logon per username ie > while a client has a session open, he/she cannot logon to the website > from another terminal. The simplest thing to do is create a new session for the user each time he logs in and invalidate any old

[Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user?

2002-08-01 Thread Baljit Sethi
Title: [Newbie Q] Cleanest way to implement one logon per user? Hello. I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction.  What I want to do is limit client logons to one logon per username ie while a client has a session open, he/she cannot logon to the website from another termina

Re: [ANNOUNCE] StateMachine::Gestinanna 0.01

2002-08-01 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:08:54PM -0500, James G Smith wrote: > > My apologies. np :). It's fun to prattle on about my babies ;). > The StateML:: stuff does sound neat though :) I'm wanting to > eventually put together a gui for creating web-based wizard-like > applications -- draw the circl

Re: $r->dir_config->(un)set issue...

2002-08-01 Thread Geoffrey Young
> > The following pices of code do not work: > > - > code sample 1 > -- > > 1. sub handler { > 2.my $r = instance Apache::Request(shift); > 3. > 4.$r->dir_config(MyVar => undef); > 5. > 6.$r->dir_config->unset("My

Re: Mandrake default mod_perl dose not seem to be working.

2002-08-01 Thread Roy Souther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Some how the mod_perl was missing some files. A --force reinstall of the RPM file fixed it. mod_perl is working now and I understand it much better. Though my goal is to get Mason working and it still does not. Thanks everyone for the help. - -- R

Re: [Newbie Q] Running into strange 420-character POST limit.

2002-08-01 Thread Robert Landrum
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:51:09AM -0400, sully wrote: > Answer: > You tell me! :) A problem with Apache? A problem with mod_perl? A problem with >IE/Mozilla? Do I need to be posting large forms such as this using >multipart/form-data with mod_perl? Please. Help. > Have you tried just regular

Re: Local file security (in 1.27)

2002-08-01 Thread Kari Nurmela
> > >So, question is: How do I protect my data files from being accessed by >anything else than my own perlhandler? Can I set another uid for all that >has to do with my specific perlhandler? Hints are most welcome. > > // Joel > > Maybe you are facing the same problem, that I asked earlier

Re: Fwd: Re: Apache::DBI as a prerequisite

2002-08-01 Thread Simon Perrault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On July 30, 2002 10:02 pm, Stas Bekman wrote: > 2) See http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/devel/testing/testing.html > Though you can really rely on it once Apache::Test is released, which > will happen when mod_perl 2.0 is released. > 1) That's an inter

Re: Local file security (in 1.27)

2002-08-01 Thread Stas Bekman
[...] > So, question is: How do I protect my data files from being accessed by > anything else than my own perlhandler? Can I set another uid for all that > has to do with my specific perlhandler? Hints are most welcome. You can't. The only solution is run a dedicated server for each user. Cur

RE: solaris 2.6, mod_perl 1.27, apache 1.3.26, resulting server fails

2002-08-01 Thread Tiller, Michiel
Hmm.. I have only this week compiled the exact same versions of Apache and mod_perl on Solaris 2.6, without any problems. I'd suggest to get the latest gcc from: ftp://ftp.sunfreeware.com/pub/freeware/sparc/2.6/gcc-3.1-sol26-sparc-local.g z And it won't hurt to renew zlib,ncurses and gdbm either

[Newbie Q] Running into strange 420-character POST limit.

2002-08-01 Thread sully
Apologies in advance for a question that may or may not make any sense. Fact is, there seems to be no other place to go but here to find a healthy collection of Apache + mod_perl + experience. Mailing list archive searches of mine must be targetting the wrong keywords because nothing has helped

Local file security (in 1.27)

2002-08-01 Thread Joel Palmius
I'm developing an online survey system under mod_perl (with a homemade perlhandler, not under Apache::Registry). Since I've had as a goal to avoid as many dependencies as possible, I store results in local plaintext files. By nature, these files has (?) to be writable by the uid apache runs as.