> Not quite sure what you mean here. The general WO request-response
loop is
> 1 Process request
> 2 Perform action
> 3 Return response
>
> Step 3 is entirely dependent on the previous two, just like any
> mod_perl/CGI/php app.
The introductory documentation makes it look each URL is tied to a
s
Perrin &al
> > Once you use it, everything else
> > sucks. There are no exceptions.
> That's kind of a rude statement to make on this list, where all of these
> people are offering free software and support to you.
Ah, you're right; I actually never meant that as a slight against things
mod_per
> WO is amazing, no two ways about it. Once you use it, everything else
> sucks. There are no exceptions.
That's kind of a rude statement to make on this list, where all of these
people are offering free software and support to you.
It's been a few years since I last evaluated WebObjects, but
Drew is correct, EOF stands for "Enterprise Object Framework".
However, it's not "part of" the WebObjects app server... it predates WO
by a long time (I think it's about 9 or 10 years old) happens to come
with WO but is completely separate from it.
On Friday 14 June 2002 11:27, Drew Taylor w
At 10:59 AM 6/14/02 -0400, kyle dawkins wrote:
>As for people claiming never to have seen an OR system that works, I
>suggest you check out EOF from NeXT/Apple.
For those of you (like me) who didn't know what EOF is, it stands for
Enterprise Object Framework and is part of Apple's WebObjects ap