Perrin Harkins wrote:
Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
If
perl's UTF-8 support is broken in 5.8.0 doesnt that mean it will break
any mod_perl application which is handling XML's or UTF-8 data ?
I didn't say it was broken. I don't really know if it is. What I do
know is that some documents, includin
No problem. Today has been crazy, but I should be able to post this
information on Monday morning.
Thanks again. =)
--TWH
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:38 PM
To: Tim Howell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mp2] make
Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
If
perl's UTF-8 support is broken in 5.8.0 doesnt that mean it will break
any mod_perl application which is handling XML's or UTF-8 data ?
I didn't say it was broken. I don't really know if it is. What I do
know is that some documents, including CPAN modules, are not U
--- Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My understanding is that setting locale to UTF8 makes it try to
> open
> > everything as a UTF8 document, but not everything is one. It
> causes
> > problems for Java and Konsole too apparently. It could simply be
> that
> > Perl's handlling of UTF
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 20:10, Stas Bekman wrote:
Perrin, do you think it's worth documented this somewhere in the
troubleshooting section? OS-specific issues?
That's a good idea. I'm going on vacation for a couple of weeks and
won't be able to look at it until I get back,
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 20:10, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Perrin, do you think it's worth documented this somewhere in the
> troubleshooting section? OS-specific issues?
That's a good idea. I'm going on vacation for a couple of weeks and
won't be able to look at it until I get back, but if no one else h
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 05:08, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
What exactly is broken in RedHat 8.0/9.0 - RedHat's build of perl,
perl's support for unicode or perl's support for locales ?
Short answer: the Perl build is fine if you change the locale to what it
was in previous ver
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Today at 6:58pm, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB> please try this patch against the current cvs. I did some testing and
SB> it seems to work. Test it on your old setup where you still have this
SB> problem.
SB>
SB> [...patch snipped...]
SB>
SB>
I applied
Tim Howell wrote:
Stas (and others)--
Following your suggestion I built/tested as a normal user. This time
only one test fails (one of the CGI tests). Below is the output from
make test.
Great. However if you don't mind to help others, I'd like you to help me to
resolve your original problem, i
Tim Howell wrote:
I figured this one out: CGI needed to be updated. =)
Yes, the cvs version already handles this test gracefully.
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl G
I figured this one out: CGI needed to be updated. =)
--TWH
-Original Message-
From: Tim Howell
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [mp2] make test fails nearly all tests...
Stas (and others)--
Following your suggestion I built/tested as a
Stas (and others)--
Following your suggestion I built/tested as a normal user. This time
only one test fails (one of the CGI tests). Below is the output from
make test.
Thanks for your help. I've only been using unix/linux for a few months,
but I've learned an enormous amount from lists like t
On Today at 6:58pm, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB> please try this patch against the current cvs. I did some testing and
SB> it seems to work. Test it on your old setup where you still have this
SB> problem.
SB>
SB> [...patch snipped...]
SB>
SB>
I applied your suggested patch t
Stas Bekman wrote:
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Today at 9:46am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB> SB> Actually it was Sunday (future!) and it's winter (past?) here in
SB> Melbourne ;)
I figured we were a few continents away.
SB> SB> Then, if it's indeed your globally installed Apache::
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Today at 9:46am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB>
SB> Actually it was Sunday (future!) and it's winter (past?) here in
SB> Melbourne ;)
I figured we were a few continents away.
SB>
SB> Then, if it's indeed your globally installed Apache::Filter and not
SB
Tim Howell wrote:
I've searched the list archives for relevant postings, and I found a
couple of messages with similar problems, but no answers. I think I've
included all relevant details. Please let me know if there is something
else I should add.
I'm working with a fresh install of RedHat
Title: [mp2] make test fails nearly all tests...
I've searched the list archives for relevant postings, and I found a couple of messages with similar problems, but no answers. I think I've included all relevant details. Please let me know if there is something else I should
On Today at 9:46am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB>
SB> Actually it was Sunday (future!) and it's winter (past?) here in
SB> Melbourne ;)
I figured we were a few continents away.
SB>
SB> Then, if it's indeed your globally installed Apache::Filter and not
SB> the local one, dump
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 05:08, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
> What exactly is broken in RedHat 8.0/9.0 - RedHat's build of perl,
> perl's support for unicode or perl's support for locales ?
Short answer: the Perl build is fine if you change the locale to what it
was in previous version of Red Hat (en_
On Today at 12:38am, PH=>Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PH> On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 09:55, Haroon Rafique wrote:
PH> > Now onto serious stuff. /usr/bin/perl here is the system-wide perl
PH> > install that came bundled with Redhat.
PH>
PH> Just a thought: did you fix the locale on that ma
What exactly is broken in RedHat 8.0/9.0 - RedHat's build of perl,
perl's support for unicode or perl's support for locales ?
I dont think the LANG variable is wrong as such is it ?
I have to currently upgrade a couple of production servers running
mod_perl and I am finding it difficult to decide
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 09:55, Haroon Rafique wrote:
> Now onto serious stuff. /usr/bin/perl here is the system-wide perl install
> that came bundled with Redhat.
Just a thought: did you fix the locale on that machine? Most of CPAN
won't compile on Red Hat 8 and 9 because of the broken UTF8 locale
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Saturday at 9:22am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB> I think the issue is very simple: @INC had system libraries dirs
SB> before the freshly build ones, so dumping @INC contents prior to libs
SB> loading should aid the debug. But please use the latest cvs, si
On Saturday at 9:22am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB> I think the issue is very simple: @INC had system libraries dirs
SB> before the freshly build ones, so dumping @INC contents prior to libs
SB> loading should aid the debug. But please use the latest cvs, since
SB> I've messed wi
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Today at 11:32am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB>
SB> Both failed due to the missing LWP. I was able to reproduce the exact
SB> problem by removing LWP/UserAgent.pm. I have now fixed both in cvs.
SB> Please 'cvs up' and test again. Thanks.
SB>
after cvs u
On Today at 11:32am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB>
SB> Both failed due to the missing LWP. I was able to reproduce the exact
SB> problem by removing LWP/UserAgent.pm. I have now fixed both in cvs.
SB> Please 'cvs up' and test again. Thanks.
SB>
after cvs up, "make test" skipped
Haroon Rafique wrote:
Experience with 1.99_10-dev (up to date with CVS till yesterday):
=
The first batch of tests passes 100%, so the filter/in_bbs_msg.t from
1.99_09 is fixed. However, ModPerl-Registry tests fail with:
Failed Test
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Yesterday at 11:17am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB> Is it possible that you have an old install and it gets loaded
SB> instead? Can you try nuking any preinstalled mod_perl libs?
SB>
Hi Stas,
This will be a long email (I think you're probably used to lo
On Yesterday at 11:17am, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB> Is it possible that you have an old install and it gets loaded
SB> instead? Can you try nuking any preinstalled mod_perl libs?
SB>
Hi Stas,
This will be a long email (I think you're probably used to looking at long
emails
Dave wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
You don't tell which version of OpenBSD you are on.
sorry, openbsd 3.3 with perl 5.8.0
FWIW, Philippe reported having no problems running mod_perl 2.0 on OpenBSD 3.3
(though I think you need to use current cvs for that).
thats good, I guess I'll try the code fr
Stas Bekman wrote:
> You don't tell which version of OpenBSD you are on.
sorry, openbsd 3.3 with perl 5.8.0
> FWIW, Philippe reported having no problems running mod_perl 2.0 on OpenBSD 3.3
> (though I think you need to use current cvs for that).
thats good, I guess I'll try the code from cvs.
D
Eric Schwartz wrote:
On Wednesday, Jun 4, 2003, at 11:52 America/Denver, Dave wrote:
I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd, and the
archives show that some people have had similar problems, with no
resolution that I have seen.
what happens if you manually run
/usr/local/apach
On Wednesday, Jun 4, 2003, at 11:52 America/Denver, Dave wrote:
I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd, and the
archives show that some people have had similar problems, with no
resolution that I have seen.
what happens if you manually run
/usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd -X -d ./t
Dave wrote:
I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd, and the
archives show that some people have had similar problems, with no
resolution that I have seen.
sure, and it was the same problem with aix earlier. The problem is with DSO
loading and it's a different problem on each pl
Ged Haywood wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dave wrote:
>
> > I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd
>
> Did you build the Perl on that machine?
>
> If not, it might be worth a shot.
yes I did, I recompiled with debugging, and which causes the segfault to
occur in different func
Hi there,
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dave wrote:
> I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd
Did you build the Perl on that machine?
If not, it might be worth a shot.
73,
Ged.
I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd, and the
archives show that some people have had similar problems, with no
resolution that I have seen.
what happens if you manually run
/usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd -X -d ./t -f cont/httpd.conf
from within the toplevel mod_perl-1.99_09
Eric Schwartz wrote:
1. Problem Description:
'make' test fails to start httpd:
[...]
waiting for server to start: giving up after 61 secs
!!! server failed to start! (please examine t/logs/error_log)
[...]
*** /usr/local/bin/perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 0) confi
1. Problem Description:
'make' test fails to start httpd:
$ make test
cd "src/modules/perl" && make -f Makefile.modperl
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
/usr/local/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib \
t/TEST -clean
*** setting ulimit to allow core files
ulimit -c unlimited; t/TEST -clean
APA
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Today at 12:03pm, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB>
SB> > In the case of 1.99_09, following happens after running "make test"
SB> >
SB> > [Mon Jun 02 15:55:16 2003] [error] Invalid CODE attribute:
SB> > TestFilter::out_init_basic at
SB> > /home/haroon/src/
On Today at 12:03pm, SB=>Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SB>
SB> > In the case of 1.99_09, following happens after running "make test"
SB> >
SB> > [Mon Jun 02 15:55:16 2003] [error] Invalid CODE attribute:
SB> > TestFilter::out_init_basic at
SB> > /home/haroon/src/build/mod_perl-1.99_09
Haroon Rafique wrote:
system details are posted as cut-and-paste from t/REPORT output at the end
of the email.
Background:
1. make test passes 100% with 1.99_08
2. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_09
3. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_10-dev (cvs)
Right, the ne
system details are posted as cut-and-paste from t/REPORT output at the end
of the email.
Background:
1. make test passes 100% with 1.99_08
2. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_09
3. make test fails to start the webservers with 1.99_10-dev (cvs)
In the case of 1.99_09, following
Steve Glaus wrote:
[...]
> Ok, I know we're probably going of topic here, but I'll ask anyways..
You can't run mod_perl, so it's pretty ontopic.
> I did what you said...the symbol wasn't there in lipperl.so. So. I rebuilt
> my perl, rebuilt the library, rebuilt my perl again.. I only have one per
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:05:05 +1100
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Glaus wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:29:01 -0500
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >> I'm trying to build mod_perl2 with threads enabled. I recompiled apache with the
>worker mpm, built mod_perl w
Steve Glaus wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:29:01 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build mod_perl2 with threads enabled. I recompiled apache with the worker mpm, built mod_perl which seemd to build fine.. however, when I go to 'make test' it gives me the following error:
Cannot
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:29:01 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to build mod_perl2 with threads enabled. I recompiled apache with the
>worker mpm, built mod_perl which seemd to build fine.. however, when I go to 'make
>test' it gives me the following error:
>
> Cannot load /ro
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:29:01 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to build mod_perl2 with threads enabled. I recompiled apache with the
>worker mpm, built mod_perl which seemd to build fine.. however, when I go to 'make
>test' it gives me the following error:
>
> Cannot load /ro
Hi,
I'm trying to build mod_perl2 with threads enabled. I recompiled apache with the
worker mpm, built mod_perl which seemd to build fine.. however, when I go to 'make
test' it gives me the following error:
Cannot load /root/cvs/modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so into server:
/root/cvs
49 matches
Mail list logo
