Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-04-03 Thread Randy Kobes
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Steve Hay wrote: > Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > $status = system "D:\\WINNT\\system32\\ipconfig.exe > D:\\Temp\\ip.txt"; > > > > > > then it carries on fine under Apache (now re-directing the output to the > > "ip.txt" >

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-04-03 Thread Steve Hay
> > $status = system "D:\\WINNT\\system32\\ipconfig.exe > > D:\\Temp\\ip.txt"; > > > > then it carries on fine under Apache (now re-directing the output to the > "ip.txt" > > file), but under Apache+mod_perl the $status gets set to 256, the "ip.txt" > file is > > not created and I get the erro

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-31 Thread Steve Hay
Doug MacEachern wrote: > lemme guess, Perl_rsignal? somehow i managed not to commit this > yesterday, it's in cvs now. i don't have a win32 system to test on at the > moment, so any feeback from you, Randy K and others helps a great deal, > thanks. Great! I've just given the latest cvs anothe

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Steve Hay wrote: > Since I had no reply to my previous problem (re-directing STDOUT in > system() calls), This is probably because you're talking about NT. Don't take it personally. > I thought I would try using Perl 5.6.0 instead of > 5.005_03 Brave chap. >

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Steve Hay wrote: > Thanks for this! > > I tried it with the latest mod_perl cvs: mine now compiles perfectly too > (_never_ seen that before!!!), and there's now only 1 unresolved external > symbol instead of 7. Looks like it could be nearly there - I'll try another > one s

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Steve Hay
Thanks for this! I tried it with the latest mod_perl cvs: mine now compiles perfectly too (_never_ seen that before!!!), and there's now only 1 unresolved external symbol instead of 7. Looks like it could be nearly there - I'll try another one some time. I look forward to mod_perl 1.23 ... Ste

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Steve Hay wrote: > Since I had no reply to my previous problem (re-directing STDOUT in > system() calls), I thought I would try using Perl 5.6.0 instead of > 5.005_03 (probably a good idea anyway) to see if that helped. > > Unfortunately, now I can't get (the Apache side of)

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Steve Hay wrote: > seems a shame I can't get it to go with Perl 5.6.0. I just wondered > if anyone out there new of any more hacks to help... Search the mod_perl List archive for 5.6.0? Most of it will be about it not working with something or other. After all,

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Steve Hay
"G.W. Haywood" wrote: > Come to think of it, NT probably wasn't the best idea you ever had > either. I agree, but we're selling a web application and most of our customers want it on NT. > > Unfortunately, now I can't get (the Apache side of) mod_perl to > > compile. > > You aren't alone. You

Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Steve Hay
Since I had no reply to my previous problem (re-directing STDOUT in system() calls), I thought I would try using Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.005_03 (probably a good idea anyway) to see if that helped. Unfortunately, now I can't get (the Apache side of) mod_perl to compile. I'm using MSVC++ 6.0 on Wi