Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-28 Thread Dan Campbell
The one trick that finally enabled me to get mod_perl to work as a DSO with IBM's WebSphere on AIX was a utility named rtl_enable. There were a few changes I had to make to one of mod_perl's makefiles (apaci/Makefile, I think) to get libperl.so to build, but even then httpd would segfault as soo

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 07:37:47PM -0500, John Marquart wrote: > > Using the following config. line: > > perl Makefile.PL EVERYTHING=1 USE_APACI=1 APACI_ARGS='--enable-shared=perl' > > Everything builds up to this point > > ... > ===> src/modules/standard > Target "all" is up to date. > <===

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread John Marquart
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Jens-Uwe Mager wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:04:12PM -0500, John Marquart wrote: > > In general - all of the previous threads on this topic have either gone > > off-list or were never resolved. > > Sorry, I dropped your last post onto the floor somehow. I will answer i

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:57:56PM +0200, Jens-Uwe Mager wrote: > >From the last post from you I have you appeared to use mod_perl-1.22. > What exactly have you been using? Oops - I did misread, you said you are using 1.24. -- Jens-Uwe Mager HELIOS Software GmbH Steinriede 3 30827 Garbsen Germ

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:04:12PM -0500, John Marquart wrote: > In general - all of the previous threads on this topic have either gone > off-list or were never resolved. Sorry, I dropped your last post onto the floor somehow. I will answer in a seperate post about these. > I spent several week

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:14:32PM -0700, Michael Nachbaur wrote: > I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get > mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their > techs want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need to > know, whats specifically w

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread John Marquart
In general - all of the previous threads on this topic have either gone off-list or were never resolved. I spent several weeks trying various configurations w/ mod_perl-1.24 & apache 1.3.12 on an AIX 4.3.3 box running perl 5.00503 and using xlc as my compiler. I was never able to successfully co

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread clayton cottingham aka drfrog
ive personally not had any probs with mod_perl as a dso blue wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Michael Nachbaur wrote: > > > I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get > > mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs > > want to know why I can't run

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:33:12PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > I recall seeing some AIX specific workarounds to some things within > mod_perl. I don't recall if those were DSO specific. I know for sure > that on BSD/OS with perl 5.004_04 it is stable as a DSO using the > latest mod_perl and apa

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread blue
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Michael Nachbaur wrote: > I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get > mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs > want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need to know, > whats specifically wrong with it? Like,

RE: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Vivek Khera
> "MN" == Michael Nachbaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MN> So, if it depends on such variables as what its compiled with and MN> what platform you're running on, then may I infer that it is MN> somewhat flaky on unknown platforms? I'm going to be running this I recall seeing some AIX specif

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Jens-Uwe Mager
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:14:32PM -0700, Michael Nachbaur wrote: > I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get > mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs > want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need to know, > whats specifically

RE: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Michael Nachbaur
achbaur Cc: mod_perl Maillist Subject: Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically? >>>>> "MN" == Michael Nachbaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MN> I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get MN> mod_perl compiled into their custom v

Re: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread Vivek Khera
> "MN" == Michael Nachbaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MN> I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get MN> mod_perl compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their MN> techs want to know why I can't run mod_perl as a DSO. So, I need MN> to know, whats specifically

RE: Perl as DSO...whats wrong with it, specifically?

2000-07-25 Thread jbodnar
I run mod_perl as a DSO without a problem. Just don't try to mix it with php as a DSO. On 25-Jul-2000 Michael Nachbaur wrote: > I'm working with IBM (sorry! Its not my choice!) to try to get mod_perl > compiled into their custom version of Apache, and their techs want to know > why I can't run m