Re: Resurrection of startup SIGSEGV with latest CVS snapshot?

2000-10-26 Thread Bruce W. Hoylman
> "Doug" == Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Doug> On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Bruce W. Hoylman wrote: >> >> Hello, Doug -- >> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> I have already applied this patch. The backtrace I provided was >> producted by an httpd executable

Re: Resurrection of startup SIGSEGV with latest CVS snapshot?

2000-10-13 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Bruce W. Hoylman wrote: > > Hello, Doug -- > > Thanks for the reply. > > I have already applied this patch. The backtrace I provided was > producted by an httpd executable with the perl_util.c patch already > applied. The perl 5.6 patch from p5p was also in effect. bruce

Re: Resurrection of startup SIGSEGV with latest CVS snapshot?

2000-10-03 Thread Bruce W. Hoylman
Hello, Doug -- Thanks for the reply. I have already applied this patch. The backtrace I provided was producted by an httpd executable with the perl_util.c patch already applied. The perl 5.6 patch from p5p was also in effect. The combined patches worked for the earlier CVS snapshot of modper

Re: Resurrection of startup SIGSEGV with latest CVS snapshot?

2000-10-03 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Bruce W. Hoylman wrote: > > Ciao! > > With the latest modperl from CVS, all tests pass during build/test > phase. However it coredumps when used with my http.conf/startup.pl > files. An earlier CVS release of modperl (modperl_2911162240) > functions as expected. Both

Resurrection of startup SIGSEGV with latest CVS snapshot?

2000-10-03 Thread Bruce W. Hoylman
Ciao! With the latest modperl from CVS, all tests pass during build/test phase. However it coredumps when used with my http.conf/startup.pl files. An earlier CVS release of modperl (modperl_2911162240) functions as expected. Both modperl revisions have the perl_util.c patch applied and pe