Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-04 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > I think you confuse, > > something. When the script is recompiled all the variables belonging to > > the package decalared by Apache::Registry or similar are getting reset. If > > you require/use() some modules that declare

Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-04 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Stas Bekman wrote: > > I think you confuse, > something. When the script is recompiled all the variables belonging to > the package decalared by Apache::Registry or similar are getting reset. If > you require/use() some modules that declare packages and have global > variables -- these won't be

Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-03 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > > > > "Keith G. Murphy" wrote: > > > > > > > ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The perl interpreter has a one global symbol table called the stash where > > >

Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-03 Thread ___cliff rayman___
Stas Bekman wrote: > On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > > "Keith G. Murphy" wrote: > > > > > ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > > > > > > > The perl interpreter has a one global symbol table called the stash where > > > > all global variables are referenced by package and by variable n

Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-03 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > "Keith G. Murphy" wrote: > > > ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > > > > > The perl interpreter has a one global symbol table called the stash where > > > all global variables are referenced by package and by variable name. > > > Since the interpreter do

Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-03 Thread ___cliff rayman___
"Keith G. Murphy" wrote: > ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > > > The perl interpreter has a one global symbol table called the stash where > > all global variables are referenced by package and by variable name. > > Since the interpreter does not go away when a script is recompiled, neither > > does

Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-03 Thread Keith G. Murphy
___cliff rayman___ wrote: > > The perl interpreter has a one global symbol table called the stash where > all global variables are referenced by package and by variable name. > Since the interpreter does not go away when a script is recompiled, neither > does the stash or any of the items contain

Re: Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-02 Thread ___cliff rayman___
The perl interpreter has a one global symbol table called the stash where all global variables are referenced by package and by variable name. Since the interpreter does not go away when a script is recompiled, neither does the stash or any of the items contained within it. Some programmers are p

Why do variables not reinitialize when script changed?

2000-08-02 Thread Keith G. Murphy
This is probably a very basic question, understood by everyone but... Why, when I change a script loaded under Apache::Registry, and the script (verifiably) reloads, do global variables not reinitialize? I'm running Apache 1.3.9, mod_perl 1.21 on a Debian GNU/Linux system. Am I the only one tha