Haven't bought there, I would, and if the timing had been better on a few items
over the years I'd have had no issue with doing that.
And credit where it's due, it was a flawless experience, Grey really helpful
and a nice guy.
And, I think they accurately represented this one:
http://movieposter
t...
Rodney
> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:04:19 -0800
> From: loveno...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
> deception?
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>
> Rich.
>
> If you construe my question or observation
we to shot his photos. So long as the photo is reasonable
>and the decription is accurate, I don't need to see an insert photo of
>every tiny ding on the left edge. Life is too short. FRANC
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMER
I couldn't have said it better. Bravo, Richard. FRANC
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard
Halegua Comic Art
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 9:26 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted"
List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of lovenoir2
>>>Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:59 PM
>>>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>>Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
>>>deception?
>>>
>>
to is
>reasonable and the decription is accurate, I don't need to see an
>insert photo of every tiny ding on the left edge. Life is too short.
> FRANC
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of
>lovenoir2
>&g
age-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of lovenoir2
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:59 PM
To: <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or
outright deception?
As the saying g
t pointing out
>>> things that could easily be missed such as a light censor stamp or some
>>> light spotting is being somewhat less than forthright. I can totally
>>> forgive the photo shop color corrections because in many cases to not photo
>>> shop the photo will
ilto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of lovenoir2
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:59 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
> deception?
>
> As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words. And unle
Do you think this window card was printed with these colors?
[image: Inline image 1]
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Richard Halegua Comic Art <
sa...@comic-art.com> wrote:
> At 07:44 PM 3/3/2012, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
>
>> Kerry
>>
>> Obviously you are allowed to post anything you want, but
At 07:44 PM 3/3/2012, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
Kerry
Obviously you are allowed to post anything you want, but please try
hard to be sure it agrees with the opinions of those who disagree with
you.
Bruce
Bruce, I completely disagree with this characterization of the thread.
I'd say it's more a
Kerry
Obviously you are allowed to post anything you want, but please try
hard to be sure it agrees with the opinions of those who disagree with
you.
Bruce
On 3/3/12, lovenoir2 wrote:
> Rich.
>
> If you construe my question or observations as gripes, then this is
> truly fruitless. I was doing
the
internet or catalogs. Simple.
Philipp
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-Original Message-
From: peter contarino
Sender: MoPo List
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:27:17
To:
Reply-To: peter contarino
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
Kerry, it is correct that you can get on a soapbox such as MoPo or
APF and publicly post and yes, an open discussion is endorsed.
However, there comes a point where facts are not always in the favor
of the person posting.
You have admitted that you have never bought from Heritage, therefore
you
Rich.
If you construe my question or observations as gripes, then this is
truly fruitless. I was doing nothing of the kind, let me be clear. The
same I guess would apply to those others (on APF) that have asked or
commented on the same thing?
And one wonders why issues get blown out of proportion
CAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
deception?
I agree, Steve. As i mentioned earlier, this discussion has also been going
on at APF. If someone wants to boost or enhance images in a book or on their
own site, containing posters in their collect
Kerry
#1 do you ever buy anything from Heritage
#2 if you buy anything from Heritage, have you ever gotten an item
you feel was misrepresented?
#3 if you ever got an item you felt was misrepresented, did you
explain any dissatisfaction to Grey Smith or any other Heritage employee
#4 if you expl
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
deception?
Ditto. I've never bought anything from Heritage I wasn't satisfied with. How
many has lovenoir bought?
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERIC
I agree, Steve. As i mentioned earlier, this discussion has also been
going on at APF. If someone wants to boost or enhance images in a book
or on their own site, containing posters in their collection that are
not for sale, that is all well and good.
Items for sale or auction, (and especially hig
My take on "boosted" images is simple.
It's FINE to do that when presenting the images for use in a book, or other
decoration.
It's NOT FINE to do that when presenting the images to sell the poster.
-S
--
Steven Warren Hill shil...@sbcglobal.net shil...@yahoo.com
Visit the MoPo Mailin
ERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
deception?
I've been buying posters from Heritage for years. I've bought more in 2011
than I did in 2010.
Many of these items have been expensive items, a number of which are hanging
on the wall
me
is Franc.
-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of lovenoir2
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:37 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
deception?
First of all,
I've been buying posters from Heritage for years. I've bought more in
2011 than I did in 2010.
Many of these items have been expensive items, a number of which are
hanging on the wall to my right while I am at this very desk
I am yet to receive any item that I feel was misrepresented
ilto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of
>>>>> Richard C Evans
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:22 PM
>>>>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing o
-
> *From:* MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] *On Behalf Of *
> lovenoir2
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:59 PM
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
> deception?
>
> As the saying go
"boosted" images clever marketing or outright deception?
Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright deception?
I posted on APF on this, that the boosting isn’t necessarily intentional. If
you take Bruce’s or Rich’s photos and open them in Microsoft picture m
03, 2012 1:22 PM
>>>> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
>>>> deception?
>>>>
>>>> While I'd far rather sellers made a concerted effort to accurately
al Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of lovenoir2
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:59 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
deception?
As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand
@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Richard
> C Evans
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:22 PM
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
> deception?
>
> While I'd far rather se
Hi Bruce,
Yes, I agree, while not all supersize images are the same, HA's hi
resolution, large images do allow for the viewing of imperfections, tiny
pin holes, smudges etc, wouldn't you agree? They have that process down,
all in all.
And as far as how a poster, WC etc looks upon arrival to one'
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 1:22 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Are "boosted" images clever marketing or outright
deception?
While I'd far rather sellers made a concerted effort to accurately represent
lots, I can perhaps forgive a little tweak for improv
Kerry,
All "super-sized" images are not the same! Some *STILL *don't let you see
tiny imperfections like very small tears, faint smudges, etc. It has to do
with the technology of scanning and the settings on the scanner.
When I buy from anywhere online, I want what I see online to match what I
se
While I'd far rather sellers made a concerted effort to accurately represent
lots, I can perhaps forgive a little tweak for improved presentation.
Though when something looks too vivid I think most collectors can easily spot
it, so it seems a pointless exercise.
Besides, aren't collectors inter
Hi Bruce,
First, it's another great testimonial to the service you provide, prior to
anyone bidding or buying (supersize enlargements), although to be fair,
your buyer who wrote you either has never bought from or visited the
Heritage, Cinemasterpieces sites (and now MPE), to name but 3, that offe
34 matches
Mail list logo
