Doesn't sitefinder give one registry superior access to the registry's
resources than the others, etc, etc?
---
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-apph-16apr01.htm
VeriSign Equivalent Access Certification
VeriSign, as Registry Operator ("VGRS"), makes the following cer
On Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:21 PM [EST], Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Doesn't sitefinder give one registry superior access to the registry's
> resources than the others, etc, etc?
It gives Verisign/NetSol the ability to generate exclusive profit from the
hijacking of every non-
On Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:21 PM [EST], Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Doesn't sitefinder give one registry superior access to the registry's
> resources than the others, etc, etc?
>
Rather then clutter up NANOG with this stuff, since its apparent that we will
be having more iss
[It isn't important who] wrote:
It gives Verisign/NetSol the ability to generate exclusive profit from the
hijacking of every non-existant domain name in existance. No other registar
could do something like this without paying for every last domain they take,
or could they ever do anything like t
--- "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> ..."hijacking of every non-existent domain name in
> existence."
>
> ..."non-existent ... in existence."
>
> Several people have said things like that in recent
> times. Including
> me, I'll bet.
>
> What exactly does it mean?
>
>
