大和一家[00244] 久しぶりですー青森にいます

2009-04-27 Thread alamiki1623
日付 : 2009年04月28日 (火) 件名 : 久しぶりですー青森にいます   毎度のことですが久しぶりです。みなさまお元気ですか。私は相変わらずのんびりとしています。今、青森にいます。やっと来れました。テツ&トモさんが桜満開の弘前でライブをするというので、お花見も兼ねてどう? とさくまあきらさんに誘われました。でも前回飛行機乗り遅れたので(汗)、さくまさんがやんわり「電車で行こうよ、電車で」というので、電車で来ましたよー。4時間だけど新幹線で眠れたのでけっこうあっという間でした。ボンビーも出ない平和な電車の旅。   世の中は相変わらずいろいろなことが起こっていますね。テポドン

大和一家[00241] いろいろと…

2009-04-27 Thread alamiki1623
日付 : 2008年11月14日 (金) 件名 : いろいろと…   10日くらい過ぎました。少し落ち着いたとはいえ、あの日以来自分でも驚くくらい落ち込んでしまいました。彼の今の境遇を想像してこれからのことを思って暗くなり、ふとずっと昔のことを思い出して一瞬ほんわかな気分にもなったり、心が千路乱れ続けています。マスコミの報道、世間の反応…。音楽史上最高の売り上げを 誇った音楽家の凋落の姿は、一部の人たちにとってはよほど美味なことのようです。ある人はここぞとばかりに批判し、ある人は躊躇いがちに擁護し、ある人はただ嘲弄し、またある人はまるですべてを知っているかのように説教めいた語りをする

大和一家[00240] ニコ動の私の動画が消される…!

2009-04-27 Thread alamiki1623
日付 : 2009年02月03日 (火) 件名 : ニコ動の私の動画が消される…!  続けて書いちゃいますが。ずっと書きたかったこと。   ニコニコ動画、みんな知ってますよね。著作者でJASRAC会員の私が推奨しちゃいけないけど、おもしろいから見てますよー。夫に無理矢理見せられてるのもあるけど。テレビ神奈川のアニメ『天体戦士サンレッド』。これおもしろいw テレビ神奈川は自ら放送済みのものをニコ動で流しているので何の問題もないです。テレビ神奈川偉い! ヴァンプさん最高です!!(人が良くて天然でお料理好きで世話好きなところが、どうしても友達のゲイの子とキャラがかぶるんですが…)ピーち

RE: Paging AboveNet

2009-04-27 Thread Jeffrey Meltzer
Issue being worked on, thanks to those who responded. > -Original Message- > From: Jeffrey Meltzer [mailto:jeff...@exobitnetworks.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:55 AM > To: na...@merit.edu > Subject: Paging AboveNet > > If anyone from AboveNet is around, please contact off list.

Paging AboveNet

2009-04-27 Thread Jeffrey Meltzer
If anyone from AboveNet is around, please contact off list. 2 BGP Sessions down, and the 800# on the website Network Management Center (NMC): 888.636.2778 (toll-free) Is generating "your call could not be completed" etc from 3 different dialtone providers. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeffrey Meltzer Direct

Study of IPv6 Deployment

2009-04-27 Thread Elliott Karpilovsky
Hello everyone. My name is Elliott Karpilovsky, a student at Princeton University. In collaboration with Alex Gerber (AT&T Research), Dan Pei (AT&T Research), Jennifer Rexford (Princeton University), and Aman Shaikh (AT&T Research), we studied the extent of IPv6 deployment at both global and loc

Re: Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread Greg Schwimer
Looks like Level3 at this point, not Qwest. Some traffic wasn't getting to us, which caused the dip in our outbound. It lasted about an hour. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Greg Schwimer wrote: > I lost about 500Mbps of my outbound through Qwest. Not sure why yet. > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009

Re: Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread Greg Schwimer
I lost about 500Mbps of my outbound through Qwest. Not sure why yet. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Paul Jasa wrote: > Confirming outages in SoCal area affecting AT&T (lost a large circuit > out there @ 1:24 PDT). I should add not all SoCal sites are affected, > just some. > Paul J. > > > >

Re: Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread kris foster
outa...@outages.org has been removed from the cc list. From the AUP: 3. Cross posting is prohibited. Thanks Kris, MLC Chair On Apr 27, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Paul Jasa wrote: Confirming outages in SoCal area affecting AT&T (lost a large circuit out there @ 1:24 PDT). I should add not all SoCal s

RE: Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread Paul Jasa
Confirming outages in SoCal area affecting AT&T (lost a large circuit out there @ 1:24 PDT). I should add not all SoCal sites are affected, just some. Paul J. -Original Message- From: James Laszko [mailto:ja...@pcipros.com] Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 5:20 PM To: Kevin Loch; Ray San

RE: Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread James Laszko
Just got off the phone with AT&T MIS Support - there is some extremely large facility outages in the Southern California area. I'm seeing T1-OC3 facilities down from San Diego to Los Angeles to Riverside to Palm Springs. We've seen voice, data, legacy AT&T and legacy SBC/PacBell circuits affected

Re: Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread Kevin Loch
Kevin Loch wrote: Something is definately happening, 50% drop in inbound traffic to our PHX datacenter across all transit providers. - Kevin Ray Sanders wrote: Are there any fiber cuts or other routing issues anyone in the Phoenix Update: Qwest did not appear to be affected by this, Highwind

Re: Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread Kevin Loch
Something is definately happening, 50% drop in inbound traffic to our PHX datacenter across all transit providers. - Kevin Ray Sanders wrote: Are there any fiber cuts or other routing issues anyone in the Phoenix area is aware of? Thanks.

Phoenix Area Network Issues?

2009-04-27 Thread Ray Sanders
Are there any fiber cuts or other routing issues anyone in the Phoenix area is aware of? Thanks. -- "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Niels Bohr -- Ray Sanders Linux Administrator Village Voice Media Office: 602-744-6547 Cell: 602-300-4344

AC to DC Power Supplies

2009-04-27 Thread Brad Fleming
Hello All, I'm in the hunt for 3-4 AC to DC power supplies and was wondering if anyone has a brand / part they suggest. Basically, we only have AC power in my building but need to stage and test devices that will live in DC-only environments. The devices being staged require -48VDC and a

Re: route flap dampening

2009-04-27 Thread David Storandt
We're using Cisco 6509 MSFC2s for core engines with three 85% route feeds and Cisco-default route flap suppression. Yeah, the default flap suppression parameters are aggressive but we want to be sure we don't hog precious CPU cycles from a nasty route flap and provide more consistent routes to our

Re: OOB customer communications (Re: Looking for Support Contact at Equifax)

2009-04-27 Thread William McCall
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Mike Lewinski wrote: > > But useless if the customer's data connection is down and their local cell > phones are the only remaining method of communication. > > If 25% of our users would check their twitter feed first and let their boss > know "They are aware of

Re: route flap dampening

2009-04-27 Thread Jack Bates
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Apr 27, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Jack Bates wrote: We've been considering it after the last flap around the world; perhaps with extremely short penalty times. Yeah, read the presentati

Re: route flap dampening

2009-04-27 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Apr 27, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Jack Bates wrote: Jonathan Park wrote: Hello all, I was wondering how many of you use route flap dampening in your network. If you have it enabled, what is the main reason? We've been considering it after the last flap around the world; perhaps with extremely

Re: route flap dampening

2009-04-27 Thread Jack Bates
Jonathan Park wrote: Hello all, I was wondering how many of you use route flap dampening in your network. If you have it enabled, what is the main reason? We've been considering it after the last flap around the world; perhaps with extremely short penalty times. Jack

route flap dampening

2009-04-27 Thread Jonathan Park
Hello all, I was wondering how many of you use route flap dampening in your network. If you have it enabled, what is the main reason? Thank you! Jonathan _ Windows Live™ Hotmail®:…more than just e-mail. http://windowslive.com/online/

Re: OOB customer communications (Re: Looking for Support Contact at Equifax)

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Lewinski
William McCall wrote: I should have clarified. Third party physical control isn't necessarily the issue, but third party administration and delivery (in the context of twitter) is. Dedicated servers are cheap and you can maintain control of the content. But useless if the customer's data conn

Re: OOB customer communications (Re: Looking for Support Contact at Equifax)

2009-04-27 Thread Brandon Galbraith
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mike Lewinski wrote: > Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > If your email and phone communications are down due to a connectivity >> break, and your customers get connectivity from you [assume no backup >> links, by default .. you'd be surprised at how many smaller

Re: OOB customer communications (Re: Looking for Support Contact at Equifax)

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Lewinski
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: If your email and phone communications are down due to a connectivity break, and your customers get connectivity from you [assume no backup links, by default .. you'd be surprised at how many smaller customers get by with a single link and no backups at all. If the

Re: OOB customer communications (Re: Looking for Support Contact at Equifax)

2009-04-27 Thread JoeSox
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:13 PM, wrote: > Twitter URL is an rss feed as well. That should work then, and a reasonable solution for not having to sign up for a third party service. -- Later, Joe

Re: Concerning MPLS paths

2009-04-27 Thread Saqib Ilyas
Furthermore, I was also wondering, if the bandwidth constraints are upper bounds, what does the traffic distribution typically look like at an LSR? We're interested in traffic within a single service provider, non-Internet traffic. Perhaps most service providers set aside some (dynamic?) pool for I

ping TWTelecom

2009-04-27 Thread Jon Lewis
Anyone home with BGP/Routing access? I opened a ticket last Friday. As a gigabit ethernet customer with a rather simple problem on your end of the BGP config, it'd be nice to actually get some kind of response beyond "Your customer issue has been entered as Change Request #..." BTW...either

Re: Concerning MPLS paths

2009-04-27 Thread Saqib Ilyas
William Thanks for the reply. You say that LSPs are not static unless you use TE tunnels. Are you referring to the staticness in terms of the path or in the amount of bandwidth reserved on each link along a fixed path determined at the time of signalling? Isn't a bandwidth constrained LSP always a

Re: Concerning MPLS paths

2009-04-27 Thread William McCall
Well, yes (if you don't count the additional traffic of signalling/routing protocols, label imposition, etc) but consider the fact that topologies change and routing will tend to change the total traffic handled through a node. LSPs are not static unless you use TE tunnels. Remember that labels are

Concerning MPLS paths

2009-04-27 Thread Saqib Ilyas
Hello everyone In the context of a single service provider network running MPLS, if a number of bandwidth constrained LSPs are passing through a particular node and the sum of the bandwidth constraints for the LSPs is X Mb/s, then is X the upper bound on the traffic through that node, or is it some